2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009903321229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: In reference to the different approaches in philosophy (of medicine) of the nature of (medical) technology, this article introduces the topic of this special issue of Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, that is, the way the different forms of medical technology function in everyday medical practice. The authors elaborate on the active role technology plays in shaping our views on disease, illness, and the body, whence in shaping our world.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hofmann (2001b), for example, argues that technology provides the entities that are applied in defining disease, constitutes the signs, markers and end points of disease, influences explanatory models, and establishes how we act towards disease (see also Hoedemaekers and Have 1999; Horstman et al 1999; Stempsey 2006a). This is in accord with insights from philosophy of technology in general, which state that new technologies often produce new ontologies, new roles and new responsibilities (Willems 1995; Vos and Willems 2000). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Hofmann (2001b), for example, argues that technology provides the entities that are applied in defining disease, constitutes the signs, markers and end points of disease, influences explanatory models, and establishes how we act towards disease (see also Hoedemaekers and Have 1999; Horstman et al 1999; Stempsey 2006a). This is in accord with insights from philosophy of technology in general, which state that new technologies often produce new ontologies, new roles and new responsibilities (Willems 1995; Vos and Willems 2000). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Historically, the introduction of new biotechnologies in health care have challenged existing disease constructs, produced new concepts of disease, created new kinds of relationships, constructed new ontologies, and even led to new ways of thinking about responsibility (Vos and Willems 2000). Clinicians are the guardians of biotechnology in medicine, and are responsible for performing clinical assessments, ordering and interpreting medical tests, initiating and continuing treatment, and engaging with patients and families concerning these practices (Klitzman 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%