Untitled

Rhoades, Gary

doi:10.1023/a:1011006511651

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

What Does the Timeline Reveal About A Retraction?2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2006

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Book4

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 30 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The median retraction time for plagiarized manuscripts is 1.6 years, which is significantly faster than that for fraudulent ones (2.6 years, Table S2, Z = 4.45, p < 0.001). Fraudulent research often triggers a lengthy investigation, which comports with the gravity of allegations , and variations in institutional responses …”

Section: What Does the Timeline Reveal About A Retraction?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct

Sevryugina,

Jimenez

2023

ACS Omega

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this Viewpoint we discuss Chemistry manuscripts retracted during the 2001−2021 period (a total of 1292 journal articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database). We showed that 58.5% of Chemistry manuscripts were retracted due to misconduct; of them, 40.5% of retractions were due to selfplagiarism and 36% due to fraud. Errors and concerns unrelated to misconduct constituted 26% of all retractions. Retracted manuscripts had a median retraction time of 1.7 years and peer-review time of 71 days (but only 43 days for fraudulent manuscripts).

show abstract

Section: What Does the Timeline Reveal About A Retraction?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fraudulent research often triggers a lengthy investigation, which comports with the gravity of allegations 51 , 52 and variations in institutional responses. 53 …”

Section: What Does the Timeline Reveal About A Retraction?mentioning

confidence: 99%