State accountability policies and Boyer's domains of scholarship: Conflict or collaboration?

Doyle, William R.

doi:10.1002/ir.174

Cited by 18 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(38 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Academic writing since you may deal with an impressive number of considerations and bits of information, which have from various sources. Hence, paper quality and writing style are also preferred to publish material by quality journals (Doyle, 2006;Hesli & Lee, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation of Personal and Institutional Factors With Research Productivity Among University Teachers

Batool

Ahmad

Naz

2021

HSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the study: The purpose of the research was to explore the association of teachers’ particular and university factors to enhance research production. Methodology: The design of the research was correlational. It was descriptive and survey research. Teaching personnel of universities participated in this research. Teachers were selected from departments by stratified technique. The self-developed questionnaire related to variables was used for data collection. The relationship was explored by using Pearson r among variables of the study. Main Findings: It was found that different components of institutional elements research procedure of departments, job and compensation, and assets and helping material have a poor, however positive correlation with research profitability of teaching personnel. Applications of this study: The findings of the study are applicable in universities. The leadership may take steps for the improvement and promote research culture at a higher level. Novelty/Originality of this study: Personal and institutional factors of research productivity were explored in this study. This study determines that how both types of elements are crucial and affect the research productivity of teachers.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation of Personal and Institutional Factors With Research Productivity Among University Teachers

Batool

Ahmad

Naz

2021

HSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Public institutions that receive state funding are placing an ever-increasing importance on teaching quality and effectiveness (Doyle 2006;Gursoy and Umbreit 2005;Payne et al 2005). Individual professors are evaluated on their ability to "effectively" bestow knowledge, at the same time that financial stakeholders-boards, state legislators, school administrators-expect increased "efficiency" by processing more students for the same, or lower, costs.…”

Section: Teachingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating and Motivating Faculty Performance: Challenges for Marketing Chairs

Honeycutt¹,

Thelen

Ford³

2010

Marketing Education Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…(pp. 17-21) The US literature on the nature and the extent to which members of the professoriate conduct scholarship reflective of each of the four domains delineated by Boyer (1990) is growing (e.g., Austin, 2003;Austin & McDaniels, 2006;Boyd, 2013;Braxton et al, 2006;Braxton & Lyken-Segosebe, 2015;Colbeck & Michael, 2006;Doyle, 2006;Glassick, 2000Glassick, , 2002McKinney, 2006;Moser & Ream, 2015;O'Meara, 2006;Paulsen & Feldman, 2006). For example, Braxton et al (2006) examined scholarly activities in the four domains in a sample of 1,424 full-time tenured and tenuretrack college and university faculty members in five types of four-year US institutions of higher education and in four academic disciplines (biology, chemistry, history, and sociology).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internationalizing a Broader View of Scholarship: An Exploratory Study of Faculty Publication Productivity in Boyer’s Four Domains of Scholarship in English-speaking Universities

Heuser

Lyken-Segosebe²,

Braxton³

2020

JCIHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Boyer’s four domains of scholarship provided the basis for a comparative investigation of the scholarly output of faculty members in 14 countries and at 100 English-speaking universities on the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (2013–2014) top-400 institutions. Full-time university faculty members who held tenured, tenure-track, and non-tenure-track academic appointments across three high-consensus and three low-consensus academic fields were the population of interest. The findings revealed that faculty members in US Research I and doctoral-granting universities and their international faculty counterparts in English-speaking universities publish relatively similar levels of scholarship directed toward application and discovery and have similar levels of inactivity in their publication of teaching-oriented scholarship. Tests for academic discipline-specific differences revealed little variation except for the finding that academic chemists tend to produce more publications in the application domain. Cross-national variation was also found in the publication of application-oriented scholarship. Suggestions for further research are proposed.

show abstract

State accountability policies and Boyer's domains of scholarship: Conflict or collaboration?

Abstract: The author applies strategic response theory to develop hypotheses about the type of response that public colleges and universities will exhibit as a consequence of state policies to encourage the scholarship of teaching, discovery, and application.

Cited by 18 publications

References 26 publications

Correlation of Personal and Institutional Factors With Research Productivity Among University Teachers

Correlation of Personal and Institutional Factors With Research Productivity Among University Teachers

Evaluating and Motivating Faculty Performance: Challenges for Marketing Chairs

Internationalizing a Broader View of Scholarship: An Exploratory Study of Faculty Publication Productivity in Boyer’s Four Domains of Scholarship in English-speaking Universities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About