1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009612517139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: A number of PCR-based techniques can be used to detect polymorphisms in plants. For their wide-scale usage in germplasm characterisation and breeding it is important that these marker technologies can be exchanged between laboratories, which in turn requires that they can be standardised to yield reproducible results, so that direct collation and comparison of the data are possible. This article describes a network experiment involving several European laboratories, in which the reproducibility of three popula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 622 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For these eight genera, encompassing both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, it was found after extensive investigation of different primer combinations that a dual restriction digest with EcoRI and MseI followed by MseI plus CT and EcoRI plus 0 as a common primer combination was an excellent approach for generating information-rich FAFLP patterns from all of these bacterial isolates. Moreover, all FAFLP reactions were run in triplicate over a period of 4 months, and the same FAFLP profiles for each set of replicates were observed; this highlights the excellent reproducibility of FAFLP, a phenomenon observed by other workers, who showed the robustness of AFLP between different laboratories (18).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For these eight genera, encompassing both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, it was found after extensive investigation of different primer combinations that a dual restriction digest with EcoRI and MseI followed by MseI plus CT and EcoRI plus 0 as a common primer combination was an excellent approach for generating information-rich FAFLP patterns from all of these bacterial isolates. Moreover, all FAFLP reactions were run in triplicate over a period of 4 months, and the same FAFLP profiles for each set of replicates were observed; this highlights the excellent reproducibility of FAFLP, a phenomenon observed by other workers, who showed the robustness of AFLP between different laboratories (18).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…RAPD markers have been a commonly used method for hybrid identification; however, they are difficult to reproduce, and are sensitive to minor changes in reaction conditions (JONES et al, 1997;MC GREGOR et al, 2000). The reliability of fragments screening was improved by developing candidate RAPD fragments into SCAR markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its simplicity and low cost are reasons for its wide application. However, the RAPD technique is highly sensitive to the reaction conditions, hence reproducibility between different laboratories is low [15].…”
Section: Random Amplified Polymorphic Dnas (Rapds)mentioning
confidence: 99%