2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008102304740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Although oral administration of a soluble proteinantigen can induce various immune responses, theeffect of the dosage of oral antigen on thepredominance of Th2-type cytokine and antibodyresponses has not been well clarified yet. In thepresent study, we fed T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic(tg) mice various amounts of chicken ovalbumin (0.1,5, and 250 mg) and examined the resulting immuneresponses to this antigen. In these TCR tg mice, theresponses of antigen-specific T cells were greatlyamplified concomitantly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we demonstrated that the low IAV infection dose tended to result in a sufficient Th1 immune response to clear the viral infection and we observed a trend towards a Th2 immune response after a high dose of infection. These results are consistent with data from previous studies, which have already shown that low-dose infection or low antigen concentration favors the induction of Th1 responses, whereas high-dose infection preferentially induces Th2 responses ( 51 53 ). Our findings are consistent with data from a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) study in which COVID-19 patients exhibited an overly reactive Th2 response to the virus ( 54 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our study, we demonstrated that the low IAV infection dose tended to result in a sufficient Th1 immune response to clear the viral infection and we observed a trend towards a Th2 immune response after a high dose of infection. These results are consistent with data from previous studies, which have already shown that low-dose infection or low antigen concentration favors the induction of Th1 responses, whereas high-dose infection preferentially induces Th2 responses ( 51 53 ). Our findings are consistent with data from a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) study in which COVID-19 patients exhibited an overly reactive Th2 response to the virus ( 54 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…High-dose antigen exposure can enhance Th2 polarization [37,38,39] and does not favor the induction of Foxp3+ T reg cells [40]. This hypothesis is supported in our study as the high-dosage AIT group had minimal Foxp3+ cells in the gut while the overexpression of Th2 cytokines was prominent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This dose-dependent effect has been observed in 2 trials of intranasal AIT for rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis 35 , 36 and in a study of AIT in a murine model of shrimp allergy 33 . This lower effect may be explained by the results of previous studies showing that a high concentration of antigen exposure is related with a Th2 polarization and a lack of FoxP3 + Treg induction 37 , 38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%