1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022474712532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the separation between neighboring chloride anions in NH 4 Cl (3.8314(1) ), Cl À ···Cl À bonding interactions also may be expected [40] (Figure 2) similar to those found in NaCl [41] or hydroxylammonium chloride NH 3 OHCl. [42] Therefore, the full set of interionic contacts here should include NÀH···Cl hydrogen bonds, Cl···NÀH pnicogen bonds, and Cl···Cl interactions; the latter cannot be described by the s-hole concept because they form no covalent bonds and thus have no s-holes, but they resemble its "like attracting like" cases.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Based on the separation between neighboring chloride anions in NH 4 Cl (3.8314(1) ), Cl À ···Cl À bonding interactions also may be expected [40] (Figure 2) similar to those found in NaCl [41] or hydroxylammonium chloride NH 3 OHCl. [42] Therefore, the full set of interionic contacts here should include NÀH···Cl hydrogen bonds, Cl···NÀH pnicogen bonds, and Cl···Cl interactions; the latter cannot be described by the s-hole concept because they form no covalent bonds and thus have no s-holes, but they resemble its "like attracting like" cases.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The quantitative characteristics of these points turn out to be quite close to the experimental ones, especially for the ionic procrystal. The same feature was recently found in other rock-salt-type procrystals (Tsirelson, 1996;Tsirelson et al, 1998). The (3,-1) critical points on interatomic lines in the procrystal were also observed early in the covalent compounds as urea (Stewart, 1991), in L-alanine (Gatti et aL, 1992) and in solid molecular chlorine (Tsirelson, 1994).…”
Section: Topological Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Promolecular atomic shell approximation Promolecular models have often been shown as reasonable or even very good approximation levels to model electron density (ED) distributions, for example in chemical bond analysis or molecular similarity applications [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] even if the ED topology may differ between experimental and theoretical models especially at covalent bonds [56]. Analytical descriptions of promolecular ED distributions are either based on atomic or ionic wavefunctions [47-49, 52, 56], exponential functions [51], or fitted Gaussian functions [50,52,55].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%