1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1003520721375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our investigation highlighted a high genetic polymorphism at intra-specific level (77% of the total genetic diversity), regardless the geographic origin. These results confirmed previous phylogenetic studies based on morphological/agronomic, biochemical, and molecular markers [23,[52][53][54]. This is probably due to the high out-crossing rate within the populations of each species which increased the intra-specific diversity.…”
Section: Genetic Diversitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our investigation highlighted a high genetic polymorphism at intra-specific level (77% of the total genetic diversity), regardless the geographic origin. These results confirmed previous phylogenetic studies based on morphological/agronomic, biochemical, and molecular markers [23,[52][53][54]. This is probably due to the high out-crossing rate within the populations of each species which increased the intra-specific diversity.…”
Section: Genetic Diversitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, studies on Vicia included up to 55 species [17-23]; phylogenetic studies on the genus Lathyrus included up to 53 species [12,13,24-26]; several studies analysed the genera Lens [27-29] and Pisum [30-33]; finally, Oskoueiyan et al [10] analysed the phylogenetic position of Vavilovia . Full chloroplast genomes have recently become available for Lathyrus sativus and Pisum sativum [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately grass pea, together with many other legumes, belongs to the ‘research orphan crops’ and little information is available on it, particularly at the molecular level. DNA-based markers utilized so far in this species include random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Croft et al 1999), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Tavoletti and Iommarini 2007) and very recently simple seqeunce repeat (SSR) (Lioi et al 2011). Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (Chtourou-Ghorbel et al 2001) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) (Belaid et al 2006) markers have also been utilized to evaluate the genetic relationships between different species in the genus .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%