2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021493615456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicated that a person with a disability often reported low sexual esteem in comparison to people without disabilities (McCabe & Taleporos, 2003;Taleporos & McCabe, 2002), which was correlated, with an overall lower self-esteem. In a more detailed investigation of their data, McCabe and Taleporos found that this lower sexual esteem was related to the length of time that the individual had been disabled and the severity of the disability.…”
Section: Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicated that a person with a disability often reported low sexual esteem in comparison to people without disabilities (McCabe & Taleporos, 2003;Taleporos & McCabe, 2002), which was correlated, with an overall lower self-esteem. In a more detailed investigation of their data, McCabe and Taleporos found that this lower sexual esteem was related to the length of time that the individual had been disabled and the severity of the disability.…”
Section: Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stems from an awareness of their difference or dysfunction relative to social norms regarding physical appearance and sexuality, along with the internalization of the deeply stigmatizing attitudes toward the sexual undesirability of people with disabilities McCabe 2002, 2003). Although all youth with disabilities may not internalize such hurtful ideas in the same way, the circulation of such ideas does impact their confidence and ability to pursue intimate relationships and think of themselves as desirable intimate partners (Stevens et al 1996;Taleporos and McCabe 2002). As Shakespeare (2000, 161) argues, the most challenging aspect of sexuality for many people with physical disabilities 'is not how to do it, but who to do it with.'…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youth with physical disabilities experience more negative views toward their bodies compared to their able-bodied peers (Rousso 1996). This is not necessarily because they perceive their bodies to be more deviant or less attractive than those of their able-bodied peers, but because of the powerful links between bodily mobility and an identity that is socially approved and sought after, which is very much bound up with and evidenced by active physical motion (Bronheim 1996;Taleporos and McCabe 2002). For youth living with disabilities, their inability to match society's view of the ideal body can be traumatic, often leading to lower self-esteem as well as an attendant desire to fit in with the cultural Journal of Youth Studies 561…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the moderating effect of partner status between sexual satisfaction and mental health was not specifically investigated in the aforementioned studies of partner status, there is important evidence that the negative aspects of romantic life (e.g., loneliness and dissatisfaction, two aspects related to the fact of not having a partner or not having a satisfactory relationship for meeting one’s emotional needs) predict personal well-being more strongly than the positive aspects (e.g., marital satisfaction) [69]. Complementing the negative is stronger than the positive, other non-prison studies have found a strong relationship between sexual satisfaction and general well-being including mental health for those who had been sexually deprived due to the presence of sexual dysfunctions [70,71], physical disabilities [72], amputations [73], and having had germ-cell tumor therapy [74].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Taleporos and McCabe compared the strength of this relationship for a group of people with and without sexual difficulty (physical disability vs. no physical disability) [72]. In this case, for both genders, the relationships between sexual satisfaction and indicators of mental health such as depression and self-esteem were stronger for people with physical disabilities than for able-bodied people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%