1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018521930114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained value was 20.550 GPa. The Nix and Gao derived H N G value which is in good agreement with the microhardness of the β-Si 3 N 4 crystals measured at basal plane inside the polycrystalline gas pressure sintered silicon nitride ceramics (2117 ±145 kg mm −2 ) [21]. On the contrary, reduced elastic modulus E r is obtained from the analysis of the unloading curves using the Oliver and Pharr method.…”
Section: Ng Model and Present Datasupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The obtained value was 20.550 GPa. The Nix and Gao derived H N G value which is in good agreement with the microhardness of the β-Si 3 N 4 crystals measured at basal plane inside the polycrystalline gas pressure sintered silicon nitride ceramics (2117 ±145 kg mm −2 ) [21]. On the contrary, reduced elastic modulus E r is obtained from the analysis of the unloading curves using the Oliver and Pharr method.…”
Section: Ng Model and Present Datasupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Higher orientation of the c-axis of elongated grains results in higher hardness anisotropy. The anisotropy in textured Si 3 N 4 is essentially due to the intrinsic anisotropy in the hardness of β-Si 3 N 4 single crystals [178][179][180], as shown in table 11. The intrinsic hardness anisotropy reaches ∼46% for the β-Si 3 N 4 single crystal.…”
Section: Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardness and fracture toughness of the textured Si 3 N 4 material depends, as it was expected, on the tested planes (Table 1). Accordingly, the hardness for the plane A, with an elevated amount of elongated grains, is a 6% higher than that for the plane C (15.2 versus 14.3 GPa), which is related to the superior hardness of the prismatic planes compared to the basal ones [8]. Regarding toughness response of the different surfaces, plane A is more crack propagation resistant (K IC = 6.7 MPa•m 1/2 ) than plane C (K IC = 5.9 MPa•m 1/2 ) due to the major contribution of the elongated grains that lead to toughening mechanisms such as crack bridging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%