Untitled

Васильева, И. А.; Васильев, А. Э.; Lyubashevskii, N.M.; Chibiryak, M. V.; Захарова, Е. И.; Тарасов, О. В.

doi:10.1023/a:1027364517929

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Then, we calculated EEDF in the energy range e > f , using Equation (8). Finally, we determined total EEDF using Equations (11)- (13). As expected, the results correspond to the initial EEDF used in this example.…”

Section: 1supporting

confidence: 64%

“…We have developed a new method using the previous theory (Equation (8)). We determined EEDF in the electron energy range e > f , and then we determined the analytical form of the distribution function by means of the curve fitting method and assuming that the EEDF f v ( e ) is given by [13] f…”

Section: Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A change in the k value leads to a change in the ratio of fast to slow electrons, while a change in defines the overall width of the distribution. [13] The parameters C, k, and are determined when the best agreement between theory (Equation (10)) and experiments (Equation (8)) is obtained. For this purpose, we calculated the part of electron density (n e ) f and mean electron energy ( e ) f corresponding to an electron energy e > f and adjusted the parameters in order to obtain the two following equalities:…”

Section: Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To simplify the calculations performed in this first theoretical test, we assumed that the ion current at saturation is The adjustment between f ( e ) and f v ( e ) is shown in Figure 5. It is obtained by successive adjustments using Equations (11)- (13). The total electron density and the mean electron energy can be determined using Equations (14) and (15).…”

Section: 1mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Floating double probe in non‐Maxwellian plasmas: Determination of the electron density and mean electron energy

Jauberteau

2017

Contributions to Plasma Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A theoretical study of the floating double probe based on the Druyvesteyn theory is developed in the case of non-Maxwellian electron energy distribution functions (EEDFs). It is used to calculate the EEDF in the electron energy range larger than -e(V f − V p ) from the I-V double probe characteristics. V f and V p are the floating and plasma potential, respectively. The analytical distribution function corresponding to the best fit of EEDF in the energy range larger than e(V f − V p ) allows the determination of the total electron density (n e ) and the mean electron energy (< e >).The method is detailed and tested in the case of a theoretical Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function. It is applied for experiments that are performed in expanding microwave plasmas sustained in argon. Analytical EEDFs determined by this method are compared with those measured by means of single probes under the same experimental conditions. A good agreement is observed between single and double probe measurements. Results obtained under different experimental conditions are used to define the best conditions to obtain reliable results by means of the double probe technique. KEYWORDSelectron energy distribution function, electrostatic double probe, non-Maxwellian plasma 1

show abstract

Section: 1supporting

confidence: 64%

Section: Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: 1mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Floating double probe in non‐Maxwellian plasmas: Determination of the electron density and mean electron energy

Jauberteau

2017

Contributions to Plasma Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of phenogenetic analysis of wood mice from the EURT area indicated an increase in the ratio and variability of minor morphogenetic aberrations and deformations in the skull texture as well as an increase in the level of fluctuating asymmetry and deviation from the control in the frequency of phenes of nonmetric skull parameters [15].…”

Section: Phenogenetic Analysismentioning

confidence: 97%

Radioadaptation of rodents in the zone of local radioactive contamination (Kyshtim Accident, Russia): 50 years on

Grigorkina

Olenev

2009

Radioprotection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.Results of radioecological investigations of rodents having different ecological specializationwood and field mice, northern red-backed voles and mole-voles to acute (laboratory experiment) and chronic (long-term inhabiting the East Ural Radioactive Trace -EURT) irradiation are summarized. These species are greatly distinguished by a way of life, a migratory activity, an average life span etc. Numerous immunological, hematological and cytogenetical disturbances were found in more radioresistant wood and field mice and northern red-backed voles inhabiting the EURT zone (density of soil pollution by 90 Sr − 18.5 MBq/m 2 = 500 Ci/km 2 ) as compared with the reference samples. On the contrary there were no pathological shifts in more radiosensitive mole-voles from the more radioactively contaminated site ( 90 Sr − 37 MBq/m 2 = 1000 Ci/km 2 ). The absorbed dozes during the life for the mole-voles from the EURT zone were significantly higher (in 30 times) than these ones for mice and voles. These data testify about the possibility of radioadaptation in a series of generations in mole-voles that developed due to their ecophysiological features and isolation of settlement in the radiocontaminated zone. Mice and voles form a flowing population and slip off the prolonged influence of a damaging factor, this circumstance prevents the development of radioadaptation.

show abstract