Artifacts in Behavioral Research 2009
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385540.003.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5 Demand Characteristics and the Concept of Quasi-Controls

Abstract: Here, the assumption is that many subjects who volunteer for research participation have a tendency to play the role of the “good subject” (an ironic term) who is both highly sensitive and responsive to inadvertent task-orienting cues (demand characteristics). Quasi-control procedures can be used to identify sources of artifacts, and there is a discussion of how drug (pharmacological) research might serve as a model for the psychological experiment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
131
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to all theories about the mechanisms of placebo effect we are aware of, if the specific and non-specific effects in drug-treated subjects are associated, it is the specific effects that would influence the non-specific effect and the potential association can only be is positive: presence and increase in specific effect should increase the non-specific effects (see Kirsch (1985Kirsch ( , 1990; Orne (1969); Wickamasekera (1980); Ader and Cohen (1991)). While theories about placebo effects are concerned with the mechanisms of improvement due to non-specific aspects of the treatment, a major question in clinical practice is the efficacy of a drug and (in depression treatment), whether or not a patient who was treated and improved did so due to specific or non-specific effects, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to all theories about the mechanisms of placebo effect we are aware of, if the specific and non-specific effects in drug-treated subjects are associated, it is the specific effects that would influence the non-specific effect and the potential association can only be is positive: presence and increase in specific effect should increase the non-specific effects (see Kirsch (1985Kirsch ( , 1990; Orne (1969); Wickamasekera (1980); Ader and Cohen (1991)). While theories about placebo effects are concerned with the mechanisms of improvement due to non-specific aspects of the treatment, a major question in clinical practice is the efficacy of a drug and (in depression treatment), whether or not a patient who was treated and improved did so due to specific or non-specific effects, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in design is a consequence of having or not having a toll value to pivot around. The same 24 choice tasks were used for all respondents in order to minimise the likelihood that the design would influence the results (a phenomenon known as demand characteristics or demand induced effects; see Orne 1959Orne , 1969. The design is a D-optimal design (see Rose and Bliemer 2009) utilising priors obtained from a large pilot study involving over 250 respondents collected from another Australian capital city six months prior.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one can ask a group of participants to respond in ways that confirm the study's hypotheses. Orne (1962Orne ( , 1969Orne ( /2009) also recommended the use of quasicontrols to evaluate the influence of demand characteristics. One such quasicontrol involves presenting the study to people from the same population as the "real" participants and to ask them to imagine that they are participants themselves but without incurring the actual treatment.…”
Section: What Should We Do About It? Practical Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of deceptive procedures, only a small minority of report of studies refer to awareness checks. This is a matter of concern given that the impact of demand characteristics is in no way limited to situations in which the study participant is misguided as to the real purpose of the study (Orne, 1969(Orne, /2009.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%