“…For example, Mariz observes that Brazilian Pentecostal adherents, including the leaders, take quite seriously the spirit world and its relation to healing and well-being, whereas CEB pastoral agents tend to disbelieve such phenomena.135 Despite this close affinity with the dispossessed and marginalized, the new charismatics, sometimes referred to as neo-Pentecostalism, have attracted large numbers of university students, professionals, and segments of the middle class around Latin America.136 This heterogeneous movement retains the Pentecostal belief in the powerful experience of the Spirit, including the manifestations of the miraculous. It is further characterized, however, by the megachurch concept and often a strong belief in material prosperity as a response to faith, generosity toward the church, and divine intervention.137 132 Mariz,Coping with Poverty,[35][36] Ibid., Sepúlveda, "Movimiento pentecostal," [107][108][109][110]Coping with Poverty, It is somewhat ironic that Pentecostalism, which emphasizes the individual's relationship with Jesus and personal transformation (e.g., Mariz,Coping with Poverty,69;Wightman,New Bolivians,[19][20][21][22][23][24] has attracted so many of the poorest people, whereas CEBs that purport to opt for the poor seem to draw the poor who are "better off". Concerning the situation in Brazil, Mariz states that "the Catholic church opts for the poor because it is not a church of the poor.…”