4D seismic signatures of North Sea chalk —The Dan field

Gommesen, Lars; Dons, Thomas; Hansen, H.P.; Stammeijer, Jan; Hatchell, Paul

doi:10.1190/1.2793058

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The difference in elasticity between water and hydrocarbons is a limiting factor for these seismic methods. The effect of pore fluid on the seismic signature has, on the other hand, proven useful for seismic monitoring of fluid replacement and change in pressure within a producing hydrocarbon field (Gommesen et al ., 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relation of acoustic impedance to stiffness and porosity of Maastrichtian chalk in Dan field, Danish North Sea

Meireles

Welch

Fabricius

2022

Geophysical Prospecting

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In seismic data analysis, acoustic impedance may be used for predicting the porosity of a sedimentary layer with known lithology, where the influence on impedance from pore fluid is known. This method typically assumes that the stiffness of the rock frame is solely a function of porosity and that there is no variation in stiffness between rocks with the same composition and porosity. However, contact cementation can cause an increase in rock frame stiffness with no significant reduction in porosity. This means that rocks with similar porosities and varying degrees of cementation would have significantly different elastic moduli; thus, attempting to derive porosity from seismic impedance alone would incur errors. The primary goal of this study is to assess how significant this error is for porosity prediction. The secondary goal is to calculate the dry rock frame stiffness across the field and evaluate to what extent the time of hydrocarbon placement affects the lithification of the rock. To fulfill these objectives, we studied petrophysical logs and core data from the Dan field and derived seismic impedance, porosity and stiffness expressed in terms of Biot's coefficient for 14 wells across the field. Trends defined between acoustic impedance, porosity, and Biot's coefficient in the Maastrichtian unit of the Dan field showed that, for a given porosity and water saturation in the oil zone, the chalk located at the crest of the reservoir is softer than the chalk located at the flanks of the field. We also found that chalk is stiffer in the down-faulted north-western part of the field for a given porosity and water saturation in the oil zone. In the water zone, no difference was found. We speculate that contact cementation downflank in the northwest block caused an increase in the chalk stiffness without reducing the porosity, while earlier hydrocarbon filling of the south-eastern block and the crest of the structure delayed contact cementation between the chalk particles. This difference in contact cementation between rocks of the same porosity causes porosity prediction from acoustic impedance to vary by up to six porosity units.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%