2020
DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa054.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

41 Characterizing the amount and variability of intramuscular fat deposition throughout the loin using barrows and gilts from two genotypes

Abstract: Pork quality is evaluated by commercial processors along the ventral surface of whole boneless loins. However, in retail settings boneless chops are evaluated individually for quality. The objective was to determine the variability in marbling attributable to chop location, sex, and sire line. The population of pigs evaluated were sired by commercial duroc boars selected for meat quality (MQ; n=96) or lean growth (LG; n=96) and equally split between sexes. Upon slaughter and fabrication, bone-in chops were rem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation was intermediate for belly fat PUFA, n-3, n-6 (CV = 15–30%), and the greatest variation was observed in chop lean IMF (CV > 30%). The mean chemically extracted fat % of chop lean (IMF) observed in this study (IMF = 3.91%) was comparable to the mid-loin IMF percentage calculated by chemical extraction (IMF = 2.70% IMF) in a prior study by Uttaro et al [ 8 ] Additionally, a study assessing IMF in various locations in pork loins of different sex and sire lines reported a range of 73.40–74.33% moisture in loin chop samples across sex and breed lines and a range of 2.77–4.02% extractable lipid of loin chops in the same animals, which are also comparable to the results reported in the current study [ 9 ]. The belly fat calculated IV in this study (mean IV = 68.0) was comparable to the belly fat IV calculated in a prior study (n = 52.5) by Lam et al [ 10 ] using fat from the outer layer of the posterior belly subcutaneous fat, as well as a study assessing pork subcutaneous fat of belly, ham, loin, and shoulder cuts (n = 162) was similar (mean IV = 68.54) [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Variation was intermediate for belly fat PUFA, n-3, n-6 (CV = 15–30%), and the greatest variation was observed in chop lean IMF (CV > 30%). The mean chemically extracted fat % of chop lean (IMF) observed in this study (IMF = 3.91%) was comparable to the mid-loin IMF percentage calculated by chemical extraction (IMF = 2.70% IMF) in a prior study by Uttaro et al [ 8 ] Additionally, a study assessing IMF in various locations in pork loins of different sex and sire lines reported a range of 73.40–74.33% moisture in loin chop samples across sex and breed lines and a range of 2.77–4.02% extractable lipid of loin chops in the same animals, which are also comparable to the results reported in the current study [ 9 ]. The belly fat calculated IV in this study (mean IV = 68.0) was comparable to the belly fat IV calculated in a prior study (n = 52.5) by Lam et al [ 10 ] using fat from the outer layer of the posterior belly subcutaneous fat, as well as a study assessing pork subcutaneous fat of belly, ham, loin, and shoulder cuts (n = 162) was similar (mean IV = 68.54) [ 11 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%