1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)84914-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3α, 11α-Dihydroxy-23-oxo-lup-20(29)-en-28-oic acid from Acanthopanax trifoliatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical shifts of C-1 (δ 35.7), C-3 (δ 73.7) C-5 (δ 44.4), and C-24 (δ 15.1) further confirmed the α configuration of the hydroxyl group at C-3 by comparing with the corresponding signals of the 3β-hydroxy-lup-20(29)-en-23-al-28-oic acid (Liu et al, 2002) [δ values for 38.9 (C-1), 71.7 (C-3), 47.9 (C-5), and 9.4 (C-24)]. Also within 13 C NMR data of 1, close agreement was found with 3α,11α-dihydroxy-23-oxolup-20(29)-en-28-oic acid (Ty et al, 1985;Chang et al, 1999;Kiem et al, 2003) for the sequence C-1 to C-17 (rings A, B, C and partly D suggesting that the two α-hydroxyl groups were at C-3 and C-11, and the aldehydic group was at C-4). Furthermore, in the HMBC spectrum, the aldehydic proton signal at δ 9.48 (1H, s, H-23) correlated with carbons C-3 (δ 73.7), C-4 (δ 53.5), and with C-5 (δ 44.4), the proton signal at δ 0.99 (3H, s, H-24) correlated with carbons C-3 (δ 73.7), C-4 (δ 53.5), and C-23 (δ 210.9) (See Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The chemical shifts of C-1 (δ 35.7), C-3 (δ 73.7) C-5 (δ 44.4), and C-24 (δ 15.1) further confirmed the α configuration of the hydroxyl group at C-3 by comparing with the corresponding signals of the 3β-hydroxy-lup-20(29)-en-23-al-28-oic acid (Liu et al, 2002) [δ values for 38.9 (C-1), 71.7 (C-3), 47.9 (C-5), and 9.4 (C-24)]. Also within 13 C NMR data of 1, close agreement was found with 3α,11α-dihydroxy-23-oxolup-20(29)-en-28-oic acid (Ty et al, 1985;Chang et al, 1999;Kiem et al, 2003) for the sequence C-1 to C-17 (rings A, B, C and partly D suggesting that the two α-hydroxyl groups were at C-3 and C-11, and the aldehydic group was at C-4). Furthermore, in the HMBC spectrum, the aldehydic proton signal at δ 9.48 (1H, s, H-23) correlated with carbons C-3 (δ 73.7), C-4 (δ 53.5), and with C-5 (δ 44.4), the proton signal at δ 0.99 (3H, s, H-24) correlated with carbons C-3 (δ 73.7), C-4 (δ 53.5), and C-23 (δ 210.9) (See Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Because of its fragrance, more and more studies focused on its terpenoids (Phuong et al 2006) and triterpenes (Ty et al 1984;Lischewski et al 1985;Ty et al 1985;Yook et al 1999;Kiem et al 2003). In the present study, one sesquiterpene synthase gene in E. trifoliatus was identified and characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%