3D Visualization and Augmented Reality for Orthopedics

Ma, Longfei; Fan, Zhencheng; Ning, Guochen; Zhang, Xinran; Liao, Hongen

doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_16

Cited by 26 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As such, the potential for improving accuracy and safety of orthopaedic procedures appears to be a significant area of benefit in the adoption of such technology. 25,26…”

Section: Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunities and challenges of using augmented reality and heads-up display in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review

Parekh

Gamble

et al. 2021

Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background & aim: Utilization of augmented reality (AR) and heads-up displays (HUD) to aid orthopaedic surgery has the potential to benefit surgeons and patients alike through improved accuracy, safety, and educational benefits. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the opportunity for adoption of novel technology is more relevant. The aims are to assess the technology available, to understand the current evidence regarding the benefit and to consider challenges to implementation in clinical practice. Methods & results: PRISMA guidelines were used to filter the literature. Of 1004 articles returned the following exclusion criteria were applied: 1) reviews/commentaries 2) unrelated to orthopaedic surgery 3) use of other AR wearables beyond visual aids leaving 42 papers for review. This review illustrates benefits including enhanced accuracy and reduced time of surgery, reduced radiation exposure and educational benefits. Conclusion: Whilst there are obstacles to overcome, there are already reports of technology being used. As with all novel technologies, a greater understanding of the learning curve is crucial, in addition to shielding our patients from this learning curve. Improvements in usability and implementing surgeons' specific needs should increase uptake.

show abstract

“…As such, the potential for improving accuracy and safety of orthopaedic procedures appears to be a significant area of benefit in the adoption of such technology. 25,26…”

Section: Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

Opportunities and challenges of using augmented reality and heads-up display in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review

Parekh

Gamble

et al. 2021

Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The analyzer might have categorised it as proper because the needle spike was on the inside the joint capsule. The implementation of such technology thus seems to have the potential to considerably improve the accuracy and safety of orthopaedic surgery [17]. According to Alexander et al, percutaneous vertebroplasty required more time with standard fluoroscopy and AR-guided trocar implantation (642 seconds with AR vs. 336 seconds with standard fluoroscopy; range: 240e438; p 0.001 with AR).…”

Section: Efficiency In Terms Of Timementioning

confidence: 99%

From Diagnosis to Therapy: The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

Gupta¹,

Ambade²

2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

By reducing procedure-related problems, advancements in computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and surgical training aim to boost operative precision and enhance patient safety. Orthopaedic training and practice have started to change as a result of the incorporation of reality technologies like virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) into CAS. Today's trainees can engage in realistic and highly involved operational simulations without supervision. With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is a greater need for breakthrough technology adoption. VR is an interactive technology that enables personalised care and could support successful patient-centered rehabilitation. It is a valid and trustworthy evaluation method for determining joint range of motion, function, and balance in physical rehabilitation. It may make it possible to customise care, encourage patients, boost compliance, and track their advancement. AR supplementation in orthopaedic surgery has shown promising results in pre-clinical settings, with improvements in surgical accuracy and reproducibility, decreased operating times, and less radiation exposure. As little patient observation is needed, this may lessen the workload clinicians must bear. The ability to use it for home-based therapy is often available commercially as well.The objectives of this review are to evaluate the technology available, comprehend the available evidence regarding the benefit, and take into account implementation problems in clinical practice. The use of this technology, its practical and moral ramifications, and how it will affect orthopaedic doctors and their patients are also covered. This review offers a current and thorough analysis of the reality technologies and their uses in orthopaedic surgery.

show abstract

“…The optical tracking system matches patient anatomy to imaging data by using a marker‐based or marker‐less registration method. Marker‐based registration requires placement of fiducial markers on anatomical targets while marker‐less registration can target prominent anatomical features …”

Section: Basic Principles Of Reality Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Marker-based registration requires placement of fiducial markers on anatomical targets while marker-less registration can target prominent anatomical features. 22…”

Section: Basic Principles Of Reality Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery

Verhey

Haglin

Verhey

et al. 2020

Robotics Computer Surgery

168

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Innovation in computer‐assisted surgery (CAS) aims to increase operative accuracy and improve safety by decreasing procedure‐related complications. The application of reality technologies, to CAS has begun to revolutionize orthopedic training and practice. Methods For this review, relevant published reports were found via searches of Medline (PubMed) data base using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: “virtual reality” or “augmented reality” or “mixed reality” with “orthopedics” or “orthopedic surgery” and all relevant reports we utilized. Results Trainees now have authentic and highly interactive operative simulations without the need for supervision. The practicing orthopedic surgeon is better able to pre‐operatively plan and intra‐operatively navigate without the use of fluoroscopy, gain access to three‐dimensional reconstructions of patient imaging, and remotely interact with colleagues located outside the operating room. Conclusion This review provides a current and comprehensive examination of the reality technologies and their applications in Orthopedic surgery.

show abstract

3D Visualization and Augmented Reality for Orthopedics

Cited by 26 publications

References 45 publications

Opportunities and challenges of using augmented reality and heads-up display in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review

Opportunities and challenges of using augmented reality and heads-up display in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review

From Diagnosis to Therapy: The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About