3D tissue scaffold library development form medical images for bioprinting application

Sahai, Nitin; Gogoi, Manashjit

doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.063

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Simplify 3D supports hundreds of different printers, provides easy switching between multiple machines, has incredibly realistic simulations, identifies issues in advance, and allows access to industry learning resources to improve print quality. In Sahai and Gogoi[ 83 ], the 3D printer Tarantula 3D was modified with syringe paste extruder for the printing of chitosan composite scaffolds. It allows us to use simplify 3D as slicing and preprocessing software for bioprinting.…”

Section: Software For Bioprintingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Software for Bioprinting

Pakhomova¹,

Popov²,

Maltsev³

et al. 2024

IJB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The bioprinting of heterogeneous organs is a crucial issue. To reach the complexity of such organs, there is a need for highly specialized software that will meet all requirements such as accuracy, complexity, and others. The primary objective of this review is to consider various software tools that are used in bioprinting and to reveal their capabilities. The sub-objective was to consider different approaches for the model creation using these software tools. Related articles on this topic were analyzed. Software tools are classified based on control tools, general computer-aided design (CAD) tools, tools to convert medical data to CAD formats, and a few highly specialized research-project tools. Different geometry representations are considered, and their advantages and disadvantages are considered applicable to heterogeneous volume modeling and bioprinting. The primary factor for the analysis is suitability of the software for heterogeneous volume modeling and bioprinting or multimaterial three-dimensional printing due to the commonality of these technologies. A shortage of specialized suitable software tools is revealed. There is a need to develop a new application area such as computer science for bioprinting which can contribute significantly in future research work.

show abstract

Section: Software For Bioprintingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Software for Bioprinting

Pakhomova¹,

Popov²,

Maltsev³

et al. 2024

IJB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…94,95 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and 3D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are among medical imaging techniques that have been widely used to obtain a detailed volumetric image for bioprinting purposes with high spatial resolution, low noise, and high contrast between adjunct structures. 96 Thereafter, a multistep process is required to delineate a proper area of interest for developing highly precise models of tissues and organ constructs, named segmentation. Ultimately, the appropriate type of substances, cells, and technology should be employed to reach the final process of bioprinting, actual printing.…”

Section: Stem-cell-derived Tissuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Bioprinting in Regenerative Medicine: Naturally Derived Bioinks and Stem Cells

Moghaddam

Khonakdar

Arjmand

et al. 2021

ACS Appl. Bio Mater.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regenerative medicine offers the potential to repair or substitute defective tissues by constructing active tissues to address the scarcity and demands for transplantation. The method of forming 3D constructs made up of biomaterials, cells, and biomolecules is called bioprinting. Bioprinting of stem cells provides the ability to reliably recreate tissues, organs, and microenvironments to be used in regenerative medicine. 3D bioprinting is a technique that uses several biomaterials and cells to tailor a structure with clinically relevant geometries and sizes. This technique's promise is demonstrated by 3D bioprinted tissues, including skin, bone, cartilage, and cardiovascular, corneal, hepatic, and adipose tissues. Several bioprinting methods have been combined with stem cells to effectively produce tissue models, including adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and differentiation techniques. In this review, technological challenges of printed stem cells using prevalent naturally derived bioinks (e.g., carbohydrate polymers and protein-based polymers, peptides, and decellularized extracellular matrix), recent advancements, leading companies, and clinical trials in the field of 3D bioprinting are delineated.

show abstract

“…Moreover, the possibility to combine multiple materials and cell types in the same process, with specific arrangements, allows to overcome the limitations of conventional fabrication techniques and it brings TERM closer to the complexity of native tissues. Finally, despite not yet used in clinical practice, in a future perspective, 3DBP will allow the fabrication of patient-specific BAOs, starting from the patient's medical images (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging) [Sahai and Gogoi, 2020]. This customization would improve the SOTA of regenerative medicine.…”

Section: Processing Techniques For the Development Of Tubular Constru...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When designing a BAO, the complex geometry is one of the fundamental requirements. One of the important innovations brought by 3DBP (and also MEW) is the possibility to design complex geometries through computeraided design models [Paxton et al, 2020;Sahai and Gogoi, 2020]. This is relevant in TERM, since today's technology provides tools to convert medical image data into printable information, allowing for the fabrication of patient-specific designs.…”

Section: Impact Of the Processing Technique On Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tubular Bioartificial Organs: From Physiological Requirements to Fabrication Processes and Resulting Properties. A Critical Review

Pien

Palladino

Copes

et al. 2021

Cells Tissues Organs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this featured review manuscript, the aim is to present a critical survey on the processes available for fabricating bioartificial organs (BAOs). The focus will be on hollow tubular organs for the transport of anabolites and catabolites, i.e., vessels, trachea, esophagus, ureter and urethra, and intestine. First, the anatomic hierarchical structures of tubular organs, as well as their principal physiological functions, will be presented, as this constitutes the mandatory requirements for effectively designing and developing physiologically relevant BAOs. Second, 3D bioprinting, solution electrospinning, and melt electrowriting will be introduced, together with their capacity to match the requirements imposed by designing scaffolds compatible with the anatomical and physiologically relevant environment. Finally, the intrinsic correlation between processes, materials, and cells will be critically discussed, and directives defining the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities offered by each process will be proposed for assisting bioengineers in the selection of the appropriate process for the target BAO and its specific required functions.

show abstract

3D tissue scaffold library development form medical images for bioprinting application

Cited by 7 publications

References 20 publications

Software for Bioprinting

Software for Bioprinting

Review of Bioprinting in Regenerative Medicine: Naturally Derived Bioinks and Stem Cells

Tubular Bioartificial Organs: From Physiological Requirements to Fabrication Processes and Resulting Properties. A Critical Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About