2017
DOI: 10.3791/55427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Printing of Biomolecular Models for Research and Pedagogy

Abstract: The construction of physical three-dimensional (3D) models of biomolecules can uniquely contribute to the study of the structure-function relationship. 3D structures are most often perceived using the two-dimensional and exclusively visual medium of the computer screen. Converting digital 3D molecular data into real objects enables information to be perceived through an expanded range of human senses, including direct stereoscopic vision, touch, and interaction. Such tangible models facilitate new insights, en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…they are studying (Smith 2016). This approach has key advantages to students over 2D still images, including enabling them to manipulate the object in 3D space, explore protein-protein interactions and stimulate peer-to-peer discussions, thereby facilitating dialogic learning (Da Veiga Beltrame et al 2017;García-Carrión et al 2020). This is further illustrated by the work of Gillet et al (2004) who combined 3D-printed models with AR to overlay additional information on physical models, thereby demonstrating the interactions mediated by proteins and small molecules (Gillet et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they are studying (Smith 2016). This approach has key advantages to students over 2D still images, including enabling them to manipulate the object in 3D space, explore protein-protein interactions and stimulate peer-to-peer discussions, thereby facilitating dialogic learning (Da Veiga Beltrame et al 2017;García-Carrión et al 2020). This is further illustrated by the work of Gillet et al (2004) who combined 3D-printed models with AR to overlay additional information on physical models, thereby demonstrating the interactions mediated by proteins and small molecules (Gillet et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously researchers have attempted to address this shortfall by employing object-based learning to provide students with tactile objects/models of the structures they are studying (Smith, 2016). This approach has key advantages to students over 2D still images including enabling them to manipulate the object in 3D space, explore protein-protein interactions and stimulate peer-to-peer discussions thereby facilitating dialogic learning (Da Veiga Beltrame et al, 2017;García-Carrión et al, 2020). This is further illustrated by the work of Gillet et al (2004) who combined 3D-printed models with AR to overlay additional information on physical models thereby demonstrating the interactions mediated by proteins and small molecules (Gillet, Sanner, Stoffler, Goodsell, & Olson, Oct 10, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 It comes as no surprise that scientists from diverse fields use these technologies to build or customize laboratory equipment. Recently reported devices include constructions ranging from optics equipment 11 to biomolecular models, 12 handheld pipets, 13 synthesis reaction-ware, 14 nutating mixers, 15 continuous-flow reactors, 16 and other inventions summarized in several reviews. [17][18][19][20] A nearly unlimited spectrum of possibilities emerges when 3D-printed mechanical parts are combined with microcontroller electronics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%