2013
DOI: 10.4161/org.26048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D printed PLA-based scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates the improvement in osseoconductive properties of nanocomposites. Rapid prototyping structures shows mechanical properties significantly higher than those structures fabricated by other well -known techniques such as solvent -casting and particle leaching, thermal-induced phase separation and gas foaming, among others [4][5][6][7][8]. In this work 3D-printing as an actively developing method for formation of polymer implants was used to produce highly-porous scaffold [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates the improvement in osseoconductive properties of nanocomposites. Rapid prototyping structures shows mechanical properties significantly higher than those structures fabricated by other well -known techniques such as solvent -casting and particle leaching, thermal-induced phase separation and gas foaming, among others [4][5][6][7][8]. In this work 3D-printing as an actively developing method for formation of polymer implants was used to produce highly-porous scaffold [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extruded PLA is then printed layer-by-layer, gradually increasing in height over the printing period. We chose to fabricate devices from PLA due to its biocompatibility [24] and compatibility with the MakerGear M2 in contrast with other printer-compatible materials, such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), which is not biocompatible and thus not suitable for working with SC-β cells. A range of parameters including layer thickness, extrusion speeds, and temperatures were explored to produce consistent devices while minimizing the z-axis resolution (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62,63 With a melt temperature around 175 °C, PLA can be easily formed into filaments for use with melt based printing systems where it is generally extruded between 200 and 230 °C. A serious concern surrounding PLA is its long-term biocompatibility because of the release of acidic byproducts during degradation, which could lead to tissue inflammation and cell death.…”
Section: Inks: 3d Printable Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…168 For instance, Serra et al combined PLA with PEG as a plasticizer and bioactive calcium phosphate glass in chloroform to make a printable polymer-based bioink for DIW bone scaffold construction. 62,66 Primary mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), when cultured on those printed scaffolds, showed increased adhesion to the surface over controls, suggesting the potential for a better migratory and healing response in vivo. The addition of bioactive glass changes the chemical and topographical nature of the scaffold surface in ways that seem to benefit cell progression.…”
Section: Inks: 3d Printable Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%