3D‐printed model for hands‐on training in dental traumatology

Reymus, Marcel; Fotiadou, Christina; Hickel, Reinhard; Diegritz, Christian

doi:10.1111/iej.12947

Cited by 38 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Unfortunately, no author did quantitative or comparative tests using models printed by VP. However most authors suggested that this technique was efficient for creating adequate models, enhancing the quality of the training [ 12 , 35 ] and suitable for planning complex surgeries [ 15 ] or dental implant treatments [ 30 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many free or open source software are available, like ITK-Snap®, Slicer® or InVesalius® [31,35,39,40,60,79]. OsiriX® possesses a free version (demo) that allows to export STL renderings [12,46,47,52,63].…”

Section: Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Printing a skull base using polyamide with an LS printer was reported to cost 250-280$ [85]. Two teams used VP printers and they declared being satisfied by the results [12,35]. A forgotten cost is related to the post-curing machine for object printed trough VP technologies.…”

Section: Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As pre-surgical tools, 3D models can make the surgical outcomes more predictable and safer, reducing the surgeon's stress and the intervention time [40,50]. Furthermore, they can strongly improve the quality of clinical education, allowing students to simulate various surgical interventions and to discuss easily about their clinical cases with their mentors [34,35,42].…”

Section: Suggestionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Also MJ printers allow to produce models that provide good haptic feedback and that can be used to simulate complex surgeries before entering the operating room [14]. Generally, they cost more than the VP ones, as well as the BJ ones [35,61]. PBF printers allow to produce accurate bone models in polyamide and glass fiber, but without satisfying haptic feedback [82].…”

Section: Suggestionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

3D printed bone models in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of three-dimensional (3D) printed bone models for training, simulating and/or planning interventions in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Materials and methods A systematic search was conducted using PubMed® and SCOPUS® databases, up to March 10, 2019, by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. Study selection, quality assessment (modified Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool) and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. All original full papers written in English/French/Italian and dealing with the fabrication of 3D printed models of head bone structures, designed from 3D radiological data were included. Multiple parameters and data were investigated, such as author’s purpose, data acquisition systems, printing technologies and materials, accuracy, haptic feedback, variations in treatment time, differences in clinical outcomes, costs, production time and cost-effectiveness. Results Among the 1157 retrieved abstracts, only 69 met the inclusion criteria. 3D printed bone models were mainly used as training or simulation models for tumor removal, or bone reconstruction. Material jetting printers showed best performance but the highest cost. Stereolithographic, laser sintering and binder jetting printers allowed to create accurate models with adequate haptic feedback. The cheap fused deposition modeling printers exhibited satisfactory results for creating training models. Conclusion Patient-specific 3D printed models are known to be useful surgical and educational tools. Faced with the large diversity of software, printing technologies and materials, the clinical team should invest in a 3D printer specifically adapted to the final application.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Suggestionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Suggestionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

3D printed bone models in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Osteotomy training for dental students using three‐dimensional simulation software and maxillofacial three‐dimensional‐printed models

Yoshida

Watanabe

Sugahara

et al. 2022

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose/objectives: Simulated educational models of teeth, bones, and gums have been used for a long time in procedural skills training in dentistry. The advent of three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies and additive manufacturing has facilitated the production of more advanced 3D printed models that can be utilized for surgical and dental training together with other technologies (e.g., 3D scanners and image analysis software). Methods:We conducted training on osteotomy in the maxilla and mandible using maxillofacial simulation software (MSS) and a 3D-printed model for 5thyear undergraduate dental students (13 students in 2017 and 11 students in 2018 with more than half of their results). We compared the group (13 students) who performed osteotomy after participating in the simulation lecture with those (11 students) who performed osteotomy after performing self-simulation (they were instructed to bring their personal computers and install the MSS) using tests and questionnaires (pre-and post-curriculum). Results: The average test score was significantly higher in the group who performed osteotomy using the 3D-printed model after performing self-simulation; participants in this group had acquired a better understanding of the surgical procedure. Comparison using questionnaires showed a significant difference in the students' understanding of instruments and surgical techniques between both groups. Conclusion:The MSS and 3D printed models are widely used clinically. Incorporating these in the curriculum will help accelerate student development. In addition, prompt education on the purpose and usefulness of these tools will not only facilitate simulation software and 3D-printed model-based treatment plan in the clinic but also promote further research.

show abstract

3D Printing in Medical Education

Chokshi,

Huzaifa,

Sriwastwa

et al. 2024

3D Printing at Hospitals and Medical Centers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D‐printed model for hands‐on training in dental traumatology

Abstract: 3D printing technology offers new possibilities for training specific dental treatments that are currently difficult to imitate. The online platform dentaltraumaguide.org assisted students in correctly managing traumatic dental injuries.

Cited by 38 publications

References 13 publications

3D printed bone models in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review

3D printed bone models in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review

Osteotomy training for dental students using three‐dimensional simulation software and maxillofacial three‐dimensional‐printed models

3D Printing in Medical Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About