2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Printed Antibiotic and Chemotherapeutic Eluting Catheters for Potential Use in Interventional Radiology

Abstract: The 3D printing manufacturing method to create instruments in percutaneous procedures is feasible. Further in vivo studies will substantiate these findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although coatings have been proven to prevent adherence of bacteria in most cases, coatings have some limitations. Currently depending on the type of coating, a concentration of 2% (w/w) is needed for an antimicrobial effect, whereas a study with 3D-printed catheter tips has shown antimicrobial properties present from as little as 1% (w/w) [30].…”
Section: Catheter Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although coatings have been proven to prevent adherence of bacteria in most cases, coatings have some limitations. Currently depending on the type of coating, a concentration of 2% (w/w) is needed for an antimicrobial effect, whereas a study with 3D-printed catheter tips has shown antimicrobial properties present from as little as 1% (w/w) [30].…”
Section: Catheter Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of additive manufacturing for catheter preparation has been barely described in the literature. There are two papers describing the use of this technology for catheter preparation [30,53]. These basic studies are proof of concept studies and accordingly contain many aspects that should be improved before this technology can be applied to patients.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The chosen demonstrator device differs in approach to other anti-microbial devices, such as those blending antibiotics into the material or through surface modification [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . These approaches have multiple issues including coating delamination and cracking in the aggressive implant service environment [16] , localized cytotoxicity from anti-microbial coatings [16] , active compound depletion [17,18] , and most crucially, potential selection for anti-microbial resistance resulting from the selective pressures that antimicrobial killing strategies impose [19] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%