2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D layered nano-flower MoSx anchored with CoP nanoparticles form double proton adsorption site for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light driven

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, EY 1* formed triplet excited state (EY 3* ) under the intersystem transition and took away the electrons in TEOA to reduce and quench EY 3* , generating free radicals (EY − ) and TEOA + with reducing ability and oxidation state [46,47] . Next, part of the electrons on the free radicals (EY − ) were transferred to the active site of MoS 2 −P, and the remaining electrons were transferred to the conduction band of NiTiO 3 and then transferred to the conduction band of MoS 2 −P through the energy level difference between NiTiO 3 and MoS 2 −P [48,49] . Eventually, the electrons gather on the active surface of MoS 2 −P to form a high electron density area, increase the adsorption of H + and combine with electrons to form H 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, EY 1* formed triplet excited state (EY 3* ) under the intersystem transition and took away the electrons in TEOA to reduce and quench EY 3* , generating free radicals (EY − ) and TEOA + with reducing ability and oxidation state [46,47] . Next, part of the electrons on the free radicals (EY − ) were transferred to the active site of MoS 2 −P, and the remaining electrons were transferred to the conduction band of NiTiO 3 and then transferred to the conduction band of MoS 2 −P through the energy level difference between NiTiO 3 and MoS 2 −P [48,49] . Eventually, the electrons gather on the active surface of MoS 2 −P to form a high electron density area, increase the adsorption of H + and combine with electrons to form H 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that in photocatalytic reactions, most TMPs, acting as co‐catalysts, provide a considerable number of active sites and accept photoinduced electrons from semiconductor materials. However, some TMPs can also serve as host catalysts, such as Cu 3 P, [19,138–140] CoP, [22] and Ni 2 P, [23,141] which can combine with a variety of catalysts to form a type‐II or Z‐scheme heterojunction. In Cu 3 P/g‐C 3 N 4 composite photocatalysis, when the weight percentage reached 10, Cu 3 P nanoparticles served as host catalyst and combined with g‐C 3 N 4 to form a p–n junction, while the low‐content Cu 3 P (1.5 wt%) played the role of co‐catalyst to undertake the task of electron transport and providing active sites [142] .…”
Section: Application Of Tmps In Photocatalytic H2 Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the metal‐P bond formed between TMPs and other semiconductors can be used as electron channel to accelerate charge transfer, which is conducive to boost photocatalytic activity. For instance, the band between P atom and Co atom provided a channel for electron transfer, which could reduce the recombination rate and facilitate the photocatalytic efficiency of MoS x /CoP hybrids [22] …”
Section: Application Of Tmps In Photocatalytic H2 Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations