2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D inkjet printing of the zirconia ceramic implanted teeth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SLA shows a very low surface roughness of only 2.1 μm [48] or 1.80 ± 0.09 μm [49] in the XY direction and a surface roughness of only 0.735 μm in the Z direction [50]. The surface roughness measured in the present work is similar to that obtained by DIW in literature, reported to be 8.3 μm in the XY [51] and 2.5-10.3 μm in the Z [52,53] direction. The dimensional accuracy was also assessed using the XCT data of 5 X-and 5 Z-direction printed and sintered mini-bending bars allowing to assess how far a measurement value deviates in geometry from the true value (CAD file).…”
Section: Surface Roughness Accuracy and Shrinkagesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SLA shows a very low surface roughness of only 2.1 μm [48] or 1.80 ± 0.09 μm [49] in the XY direction and a surface roughness of only 0.735 μm in the Z direction [50]. The surface roughness measured in the present work is similar to that obtained by DIW in literature, reported to be 8.3 μm in the XY [51] and 2.5-10.3 μm in the Z [52,53] direction. The dimensional accuracy was also assessed using the XCT data of 5 X-and 5 Z-direction printed and sintered mini-bending bars allowing to assess how far a measurement value deviates in geometry from the true value (CAD file).…”
Section: Surface Roughness Accuracy and Shrinkagesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Bending strengths up to 563 MPa in the X direction were reported for robocasted 3Y-TZP [53]. Similar strengths up to almost 500 MPa and above were reached in other DIW studies [52,71,72]. The highest strength could be reached for a more defect-tolerant Ce-TZP based ceramic, indicating opportunities for using other stabilizers for TZP [73].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, creating biomedical devices must be heterogeneous in most cases. According to Shi and Wang[ 34 ], current researches on 3D printing technology for biomedical applications in the field of printing of non-living objects can be classified into two main areas: Personalized manufacturing of permanent non-invasive implants and fabrication of local scaffolds, which could be biodegradable or bioactive. The advantage of 3D printing of implants over traditional machine technology is that 3D printing can achieve personalized real-time manufacturing of any sophisticated implant with high-dimensional accuracy and short production cycles.…”
Section: Scaffolds and Bioimplants Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the procedure of support technology is more complicated and it is difficult to precisely control the printing process, which significantly reduces the potential application of 3D printing technology. Currently, primary 3D printing processing techniques for inclined-plane ceramic shaping generally employ laser, binder, gels, ultraviolet (UV) or visible curable resins to retain the inclined-shape while printing green parts [16,17], such as stereolithography (SLA) [18,19], selective laser sintering (SLS), gel-printing [20][21][22], and binder jetting. The fabrication of ceramic parts through these shaping processes was rather costintensive or time-consuming [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%