2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D inkjet-printing of photo-crosslinkable resins for microlens fabrication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermal inkjet printers can deposit ink volumes between 10 and 150 pL from the nozzle, however this is dependent on temperature gradient, current pulse and ink viscosity [54]. The limiting factor to thermal inkjet technology is the large droplet size which is typically as large as the printing nozzle itself and the need for the printing ink to withstand high temperatures [55]. Therefore, inkjet printing has been advanced to electrohydrodynamic printing as this technique has the ability to print at a dimension smaller than the nozzle at room temperature and high speed [6].…”
Section: Thermal Inkjet Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal inkjet printers can deposit ink volumes between 10 and 150 pL from the nozzle, however this is dependent on temperature gradient, current pulse and ink viscosity [54]. The limiting factor to thermal inkjet technology is the large droplet size which is typically as large as the printing nozzle itself and the need for the printing ink to withstand high temperatures [55]. Therefore, inkjet printing has been advanced to electrohydrodynamic printing as this technique has the ability to print at a dimension smaller than the nozzle at room temperature and high speed [6].…”
Section: Thermal Inkjet Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the thermal reflow process requires high temperatures, and it is challenging to fabricate microlenses (MLs) with high numerical apertures (NA). [ 12 ] Other approaches, including hot embossing, [ 13 ] electrowetting, [ 14 ] and soft lithography [ 15 ] have been adopted to fabricate MLAs with a FF of nearly 100%. However, these approaches do not allow for additive manufacturing on various substrates and fast prototyping of MLAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, inkjet printing, which also allows for maskless additive manufacturing of MLAs, offers a variety of advantages. [ 12,17 ] First, inkjet printing is a straightforward and versatile process where the fabrication of MLAs is digitally controlled in a real‐time manner, which allows for fast prototyping of MLAs. Second, only the material amount needed for the MLs is used in printing, thereby preventing the material waste to a large extent and improving the cost‐effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1–3 ] However, the manufacturing efficiency, form accuracy, and surface roughness are the inherent limitations of the 3D printed components for high‐performance optical applications. [ 4,5 ] Unlike the point‐by‐point scanning in the two‐photon polymerization (TPP) [ 1,6 ] and inkjet‐based printing, [ 7,8 ] the projection stereolithography using a stepwise layer‐by‐layer approach is regarded as a more efficient way for the high‐speed manufacturing of refractive polymeric lenses. [ 5,9 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
inkjet-based printing, [7,8] the projection stereolithography using a stepwise layerby-layer approach is regarded as a more efficient way for the high-speed manufacturing of refractive polymeric lenses. [5,9] Although the layerwise projection stereolithography achieved a thousand fold increase in manufacturing efficiency, it still required hours to print millimetersized lenses due to the slow speed of component separation and resin refilling in each layer.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%