2006
DOI: 10.1007/11919629_80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Geometry from Uncalibrated Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly, MVS methods assume a relatively uniform viewpoint distribution and simply choose the k nearest images for each reference view [19,4,6]. CPC datasets are more challenging in that they are non-uniformly distributed in a 7D viewpoint space of camera pose and focal length, thus representing an extreme case of unorganized image sets [12]. Furthermore, choosing the nearest views is often undesirable, since many images are nearly identical and thus offer little parallax.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Commonly, MVS methods assume a relatively uniform viewpoint distribution and simply choose the k nearest images for each reference view [19,4,6]. CPC datasets are more challenging in that they are non-uniformly distributed in a 7D viewpoint space of camera pose and focal length, thus representing an extreme case of unorganized image sets [12]. Furthermore, choosing the nearest views is often undesirable, since many images are nearly identical and thus offer little parallax.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is closely related to Kamberov et al's automatic geometry reconstruction pipeline for unstructured image sets [12]. The key algorithmic differences are our use of MVS instead of binocular stereo for each reference view and our view selection approach, which accounts for variations in image resolution and avoids matching narrow baselines.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing pipelines either assume known internal parameters [26,27,19,28,29,15,24], or constant internal parameters [30], or rely on EXIF data plus external information (camera CCD dimensions) [31,32]. Methods working in large scale environments usually rely on a lot of additional information, such as camera calibration and GPS/INS navigation systems [2,33] or geotags [17].…”
Section: Structure-and-motion: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant literature comprises several Structure and Motion (SaM) pipelines that process images in batch and handle the reconstruction process making no assumptions on the imaged scene and on the acquisition rig (Brown and Lowe, 2005, Kamberov et al, 2006, Snavely et al, 2006, Vergauwen and Gool, 2006, Irschara et al, 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%