“…Direct use of raw simpletree QSMs to estimate tree volume highlighted the (expected) difficulties of the cylinder‐based, automated approach to describe large tree stumps and crowns, requiring manual edits and the separate modelling of buttressed parts with a mesh model (Cushman, Muller‐Landau, Condit, & Hubbell, ; Nogueira, Fearnside, Nelson, Barbosa, & Keizer, ; Nölke et al., ; Olagoke et al., ; Picard & Saint‐andré, ). While reconstruction algorithms are rapidly evolving (Raumonen et al., , ; Stovall et al., ; Tao et al., ; Trochta et al., ) in the hope to upscale studies to entire forest stands, the semi‐automated procedure proposed here is already fully operational even in very dense tropical forests at the leaf‐on stage, allowing to improve validation R ² for tree volumes from .75 to .98, and to reduce from 29% to 12%. It offers a real alternative to destructive approaches, without significant loss of precision, and with the very significant added value that other measurements will be feasible on the sampled trees at a later stage, including for multi‐temporal comparisons, allowing the precise monitoring of tree growth patterns, crown plasticity, interactions with neighbours, etc.…”