2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D crustal and lithospheric model of the Arabia–Eurasia collision zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, usually one or two parameters only are determined in such kind of studies. For example, Motavalli‐Anbaran et al (), studying a part of the Arabia‐Eurasia collision zone with limited constraints on the crustal structure determination, restricted their gravity inversion to the Moho and LAB depth determinations. In the present study, we use a joint inversion of seismic tomography, residual (crust‐free) gravity anomalies (Figure b), and residual topography to produce a 3‐D density model of the mantle to a depth of 700 km (Kaban, El Khrepy, et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, usually one or two parameters only are determined in such kind of studies. For example, Motavalli‐Anbaran et al (), studying a part of the Arabia‐Eurasia collision zone with limited constraints on the crustal structure determination, restricted their gravity inversion to the Moho and LAB depth determinations. In the present study, we use a joint inversion of seismic tomography, residual (crust‐free) gravity anomalies (Figure b), and residual topography to produce a 3‐D density model of the mantle to a depth of 700 km (Kaban, El Khrepy, et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…parameters only are determined in such kind of studies. For example,Motavalli-Anbaran et al (2016), studying a part of the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone with limited constraints on the crustal structure determination, restricted their gravity inversion to the Moho and LAB depth determinations. In the present…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Motavalli‐Anbaran et al . ) and, more importantly, simplifying the inverse problem in terms of reducing the number of model parameters appropriately (e.g., Diouane ). Utilisation of these strategies allows the smoothing parameter to be effectively determined by trial and error, which is in fact a common practice in inverse problems (e.g., Motavalli‐Anbaran et al .…”
Section: Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Motavalli‐Anbaran et al . ). Although the difference in gravity effects between a constant‐density crustal model and a linear gradient one is considerable, it is quite small between an exponential‐density crustal model and a linear gradient one for the same average densities (Motavalli‐Anbaran, Zeyen and Ardestani ).…”
Section: Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation