S U M M A R YWe present a new tomographic model for P-and S-velocity anomalies beneath Europe (30 • N-55 • N, 5 • W-40 • E), extending in depth up to 700 km and constrained by inversion of data from the International Seismological Center (ISC) catalogue. The algorithm uses the traveltimes from events located in the study area recorded by all available worldwide stations, as well as times from teleseismic events recorded by European stations. The events from the ISC catalogue have been relocated and combined into composite events. All the traveltimes were corrected for crustal structure using the reference model EuCRUST-07. The resulting velocity anomalies show similar large-scale patterns as observed in previous studies, but have a higher resolution, which allows detection of some features in more detail. For example, it is now possible to assess the depth extension of the small slow velocity body beneath the Eifel region and Eger graben. The P and the S model show a good consistency in the uppermost 200 km below most of the European area and in some parts even in the deeper layers (e.g. beneath the Apennines and the Hellenic arc). The new model provides clear images of some principal features, which were previously detected in a limited number of studies, while the comparison between P-and S-velocity anomalies provides novel constraints to address on their nature (e.g. the gap in the Adriatic plate subducted below the central-southern Apennines). In this paper, we pay special attention to testing the reliability of the results. The random noise effect is evaluated using a test with independent inversion of two data subsets (with odd/even events). The spatial resolution is estimated using different checkerboard tests. Furthermore, we present a synthetic model with realistic patterns, which reproduces after performing forward and inverse modelling the same shape and amplitudes of the anomalies as in the case of the real data inversion. In this case, the parameters of the model can be used to assess the amplitudes of P and S anomalies that is critical for evaluation of other petrophysical parameters (temperature, density, composition, etc.) in the upper mantle.
[1] We present a new digital model (EuCRUST-07) for the crust of Western and Central Europe and surroundings (35°N-71°N, 25°W-35°E). Available results of seismic reflection, refraction and receiver functions studies are assembled in an integrated model at a uniform grid (15 0 Â 15 0 ). The model consists of three layers: sediments and two layers of the crystalline crust. Besides depth to the boundaries, we provide average P-wave velocities in the upper and lower parts of the crystalline crust. The new model demonstrates large differences in the Moho depth compared to previous compilations, over ±10 km in some specific areas (e.g. the Baltic Shield). Furthermore, the velocity structure of the crust is much more heterogeneous than in previous maps. EuCRUST-07 offers a starting point for numerical modeling of deeper structures by allowing correction for crustal effects beforehand and to resolve trade-off with mantle heterogeneities.
[1] The upper mantle of North America has been well studied using various seismic methods. Here we investigate the density structure of the North American (NA) upper mantle based on the integrative use of the gravity field and seismic data. The basis of our study is the removal of the gravitational effect of the crust to determine the mantle gravity anomalies. The effect of the crust is removed in three steps by subtracting the gravitational contributions of (1) topography and bathymetry, (2) low-density sedimentary accumulations, and (3) the three-dimensional density structure of the crystalline crust as determined by seismic observations. Information regarding sedimentary accumulations, including thickness and density, are taken from published maps and summaries of borehole measurements of densities; the seismic structure of the crust is based on a recent compilation, with layer densities estimated from P-wave velocities. The resultant mantle gravity anomaly map shows a pronounced negative anomaly (−50 to −400 mGal) beneath western North America and the adjacent oceanic region and positive anomalies (+50 to +350 mGal) east of the NA Cordillera. This pattern reflects the well-known division of North America into the stable eastern region and the tectonically active western region. The close correlation of large-scale features of the mantle anomaly map with those of the topographic map indicates that a significant amount of the topographic uplift in western NA is due to buoyancy in the hot upper mantle, a conclusion supported by previous investigations. To separate the contributions of mantle temperature anomalies from mantle compositional anomalies, we apply an additional correction to the mantle anomaly map for the thermal structure of the uppermost mantle. The thermal model is based on the conversion of seismic shear-wave velocities to temperature and is consistent with mantle temperatures that are independently estimated from heat flow and heat production data. The thermally corrected mantle density map reveals density anomalies that are chiefly due to compositional variations. These compositional density anomalies cause gravitational anomalies that reach ∼250 mGal. A pronounced negative anomaly (−50 to −200 mGal) is found over the Canadian shield, which is consistent with chemical depletion and a corresponding low density of the lithospheric mantle, also referred to as the mantle tectosphere. The strongest positive anomaly is coincident with the Gulf of Mexico and indicates a positive density anomaly in the upper mantle, possibly an eclogite layer that has caused subsidence in the Gulf. Two linear positive anomalies are also seen south of 40°N: one with a NE-SW trend in the eastern United States, roughly coincident with the Grenville-Appalachians, and a second with a NW-SE trend beneath the states of Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado. These anomalies are interpreted as being due to (1) the presence of remnants of an oceanic slab in the upper mantle beneath the Grenville-Appalachian suture and (2) mantle thick...
GF is high and melt water is present under ice cover [11][12] Greenland to explain the origin of the observed melting beneath the ice cover (Figure 1). This are controlled by a combination of GF and non-GF influences, we build our calibration 137 strategy on estimating GF required to reproduce the observed thawed basal ice conditions, 138 discounting basal ice melt rates as a proxy for GF. This has the effect that GF estimates will 139 likely be biased downwards where basal melt is rapid; nevertheless, our strategy is 140 sufficiently effective to separate out the signal of a strong and spatially extensive geothermal 141 anomaly beneath the GIS and provides a hard lower bound for GF values at the observed 142 basal melt locations. 143The anomalous GF zone lies in the area with the highest density of direct measurements. 150One potential cause of elevated GF is illustrated by seismic data that link our west-to-east GF 151anomaly with a zone of low-seismic-velocity mantle, a "negative anomaly", beneath Iceland 6- Greenland may be the expression of Iceland hotspot history. The geothermal anomaly 237 provides evidence for a more northerly hotspot track than previously proposed and will offer 238 a useful test for existing paleoreconstructions of absolute plate motion. This study advocates 239 a previously undocumented strong coupling between Greenland's present-day ice dynamics, 240 subglacial hydrology, and the remote tectonothermal history of the North Atlantic region.
The origin and evolution of cratonic roots has been debated for many years. Precambrian cratons are underlain by cold lithospheric roots that are chemically depleted. Thermal and petrologic data indicate that Archean roots are colder and more chemically depleted than Proterozoic roots. This observation has led to the hypothesis that the degree of depletion in a lithospheric root depends mostly on its age. Here we test this hypothesis using gravity, thermal, petrologic, and seismic data to quantify differences in the density of cratonic roots globally. In the first step in our analysis we use a global crustal model to remove the crustal contribution to the observed gravity. The result is the mantle gravity anomaly field, which varies over cratonic areas from 3100 to +100 mGal. Positive mantle gravity anomalies are observed for cratons in the northern hemisphere: the Baltic shield, East European Platform, and the Siberian Platform. Negative anomalies are observed over cratons in the southern hemisphere: Western Australia, South America, the Indian shield, and Southern Africa. This indicates that there are significant differences in the density of cratonic roots, even for those of similar age. Root density depends on temperature and chemical depletion. In order to separate these effects we apply a lithospheric temperature correction using thermal estimates from a combination of geothermal modeling and global seismic tomography models. Gravity anomalies induced by temperature variations in the uppermost mantle range from 3200 to +300 mGal, with the strongest negative anomalies associated with mid-ocean ridges and the strongest positive anomalies associated with cratons. After correcting for thermal effects, we obtain a map of density variations due to lithospheric compositional variations. These maps indicate that the average density decrease due to the chemical depletion within cratonic roots varies from 1.1% to 1.5%, assuming the chemical boundary layer has the same thickness as the thermal boundary layer. The maximal values of the density drop are in the range 1.7^2.5%, and correspond to the Archean portion of each craton. Temperatures within cratonic roots vary strongly, and our analysis indicates that density variations in the roots due to temperature are larger than the variations due to chemical differences. ß
We introduce a new method to construct integrated 3-D models of density, temperature, and compositional variations of the crust and upper mantle based on a combined analysis of gravity, seismic, and tomography data with mineral physics constraints. The new technique is applied to North America. In the first stage, we remove the effect of the crust from the observed gravity field and topography, using a new crustal model (NACr2014). In the second step, the residual mantle gravity field and residual topography are inverted to obtain a 3-D density model of the upper mantle. The inversion technique accounts for the notion that these fields are controlled by the same factors but in a different way, e.g., depending on depth and horizontal dimension. This enables us to locate the position of principal density anomalies in the upper mantle. Afterward, we estimate the thermal contribution to the density structure by inverting two tomography models for temperature (NA07 and SL2013sv), assuming a laterally and vertically uniform ''fertile'' mantle composition. Both models show the cold internal part and the hot western margin of the continent, while in some Proterozoic regions (e.g., Grenville province) NA07 at a depth of 100 km is >200 C colder than SL2013sv. After removing this effect from the total mantle anomalies, the residual ''compositional'' fields are obtained. Some features of the composition density distribution, which are invisible in the seismic tomography data, are detected for the first time in the upper mantle. These results serve as a basis for the second part of the study, in which we improve the thermal and compositional models by applying an iterative approach to account for the effect of composition on the thermal model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.