2021
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D bioprinting and microscale organization of vascularized tissue constructs using collagen‐based bioink

Abstract: Bioprinting three-dimensional (3D) tissue equivalents have progressed tremendously over the last decade. 3D bioprinting is currently being employed to develop larger and more physiologic tissues, and it is of particular interest to generate vasculature in biofabricated tissues to aid better perfusion and transport of nutrition. Having an advantage over manual culture systems by bringing together biological scaffold materials and cells in precise 3D spatial orientation, bioprinting could assist in placing endot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D designing was done with the help of Slic3r software (GNU Affero, Slic3r) to generate the desired shape, size, thickness, and layer profile (pattern and infill density) of the printed collagen membrane. [ 39 ] The 3D printed membrane was incubated at 37 °C (30 to 60 min) for complete gelation. Further, printed membranes were stored at 4 °C in 1× PBS containing respective antimicrobial concentration to prevent shrinkage and dilution of the antimicrobial content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D designing was done with the help of Slic3r software (GNU Affero, Slic3r) to generate the desired shape, size, thickness, and layer profile (pattern and infill density) of the printed collagen membrane. [ 39 ] The 3D printed membrane was incubated at 37 °C (30 to 60 min) for complete gelation. Further, printed membranes were stored at 4 °C in 1× PBS containing respective antimicrobial concentration to prevent shrinkage and dilution of the antimicrobial content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, only exopolysaccharides (except for bacterial cellulose that was considered in Section 2.2 ) will be reviewed since they are the most commonly used microbial polysaccharides for bioprinting applications [ 26 ]. The usage of these polysaccharides in 3D bioprinting is still gaining ground since the exploitation of microbial-derived polysaccharides-based bioinks has only been recently described in the literature [ 151 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 ], as summarized in Table 3 .…”
Section: Polysaccharide-based Hydrogel Bioinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it constitutes an excellent option to improve the rheological and mechanical characteristics of bioinks. However, its application in the fabrication of bioinks for 3D bioprinting is still relatively new, with just three published papers on the topic [ 154 , 155 , 169 ].…”
Section: Polysaccharide-based Hydrogel Bioinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a 3DA aims to mimic the in vivo microarchitectures more closely, allowing for greater cell‐to‐cell contact and signalling networks (Abbott, 2003; Rosa et al, 2013). Nonetheless, the procedures used to produce 3D structures are more labourious and often demand specific skillsets and equipment (Bhargav et al, 2020; Muthusamy et al, 2021; Sriram et al, 2019). The following sections will discuss the potential uses of such technologies for the advancement of dental pulp tissue engineering and regeneration.…”
Section: Technologies For Pulp Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%