1998
DOI: 10.1889/1.1833661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

38.2: The Detection of Moving Features on a Display: The Interaction of Direction of Motion, Orientation, and Display Rate

Abstract: The contrast detection thresholds for Gabor patches, as a function of speed, oscillated by as much as a log unit when the motion was orthogonal to the orientation of the Gabor. Sensitivity was mediated by temporal frequency alone. Parallel motion, wide-band stimuli, and eye tracking allowed for higher sensitivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon has been attributed to the fact that eye movements lower the retinal velocity of the stimulus, bringing it to a visible range. The explanation is supported by evidence that sensitivity during pursuit of drifting gratings equals sensitivity to static gratings under fixation (Murphy, 1978;Flipse et al, 1988;Peli et al, 1998). Thus, sensitivity is governed by retinal motion, not by motion within an external reference system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This phenomenon has been attributed to the fact that eye movements lower the retinal velocity of the stimulus, bringing it to a visible range. The explanation is supported by evidence that sensitivity during pursuit of drifting gratings equals sensitivity to static gratings under fixation (Murphy, 1978;Flipse et al, 1988;Peli et al, 1998). Thus, sensitivity is governed by retinal motion, not by motion within an external reference system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%