2013
DOI: 10.12739/nwsa.2013.8.4.2b0095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

35-45 Yaş Kadinlarda Beden Ki̇tle İndeksi̇ İle Postural Di̇nami̇k Denge İli̇şki̇si̇

Abstract: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BODY MASS INDEX AND POSTURAL DYNAMIC BALANCE AMONG 35-45 AGED WOMEN ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and postural dynamic balance among 35-45 aged women (n=40). It was measured BMI using Tanita BC-418 and stability indices were obtained using Biodex Stability System (eyes open and eyes closed). Subjects were tested 60 seconds, starting level 8 and finished level 3. It was found that 20% of subjects were normal (n=8), 45% were over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is reported in the literature that there is a significant relationship between high BMI values and postural stability and fall risk, it is also stated that there is no generalization that obese women are at more risk of fall. 18 In our study, we think that this is not clinically important because the patients are not older, BMI values are not very high and they are very close to the control group values. There was a significant difference in fall history and FES-I values in favor of the patient group in accordance with the literature while there was no correlation between the risk of fall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although it is reported in the literature that there is a significant relationship between high BMI values and postural stability and fall risk, it is also stated that there is no generalization that obese women are at more risk of fall. 18 In our study, we think that this is not clinically important because the patients are not older, BMI values are not very high and they are very close to the control group values. There was a significant difference in fall history and FES-I values in favor of the patient group in accordance with the literature while there was no correlation between the risk of fall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%