2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01818-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High dose simultaneous integrated boost for node positive cervical cancer

Abstract: Introduction Lymph node metastases presenting with locally advanced cervical cancer are poor prognostic features. Modern radiotherapy approaches enable dose escalation to radiologically abnormal nodes. This study reports the results of a policy of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in terms of treatment outcomes. Materials and methods Patients treated with radical chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced cervical cancer includi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were treated with a combination of IMRT/VMAT (45 Gy/25f), weekly cisplatin chemotherapy, and pushes to LNM (60 Gy/25f), followed by ICRT(28 Gy/4f). The 3-year OS rate, local recurrence-free survival rate, regional recurrence-free survival rate, and distant recurrence-free survival rate were 69%, 91%, 79%, and 77% in 23 patients, not statistically significant when compared to patients without LNM [ 27 ]. In a prospective study by Beriwal et al, 36 patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer were treated with IMRT and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were treated with a combination of IMRT/VMAT (45 Gy/25f), weekly cisplatin chemotherapy, and pushes to LNM (60 Gy/25f), followed by ICRT(28 Gy/4f). The 3-year OS rate, local recurrence-free survival rate, regional recurrence-free survival rate, and distant recurrence-free survival rate were 69%, 91%, 79%, and 77% in 23 patients, not statistically significant when compared to patients without LNM [ 27 ]. In a prospective study by Beriwal et al, 36 patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer were treated with IMRT and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the paradigm shift towards MR-based IGABT in the past decade achieving excellent local control, there is a pressing demand to address regional and systemic disease control, especially in patients with node-positive disease [ 10 ]. One of the attractive strategies is dose escalation to involved nodes, which has demonstrated encouraging outcomes [ 18 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. However, the dose–response relationship for nodal control has not been clearly defined, thus consensus on the optimal dose prescription is lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dose–response relationship for nodal control has not been clearly defined, thus consensus on the optimal dose prescription is lacking. In clinical practice, SIB is commonly prescribed in the range of 55–60 Gy in 25 fractions [ 18 , 36 , 37 ]. Bacorro et al [ 38 ] suggested that increasing the total nodal dose from 50 Gy to 60 Gy EQD2 could significantly improve nodal control, especially for bulky nodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 patients from EMBRACE study received a median nodal boost dose of 62 Gy EQD2, only six patients recurred in boosted nodes with a median follow up of 30 months [ 30 ]. Jayatilakebanda, et al delivered a total dose of 60 Gy in 25 fractions to radiologically abnormal pelvic nodes by SIB technique and found no increase in toxicity compared to node negative patients [ 29 ]. Based on these results, we adopted SIB-IMRT technique in our trial and designed a 53.50–59.92 Gy /25–28 fractions boost protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%