2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Improving Pain and Function in Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Risk-of-Bias Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another meta-analysis based on 16 studies, Chen et al, found that despite a significant clinical improvement, they were unable to recommend for or against the use of PRP for lateral epicondylitis. This was due to the small number of comparable studies, a lack of quantification of the specific PRP content, considerable heterogeneity between the randomized control trials, and most effect sizes being equivocal within the framework of two estimated MCID values [47]. Another point of view was presented by de Vos et al, in their systematic review based on six studies, in which the authors stated that there was strong evidence that PRP is not effective in treating chronic lateral elbow tendinosis [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another meta-analysis based on 16 studies, Chen et al, found that despite a significant clinical improvement, they were unable to recommend for or against the use of PRP for lateral epicondylitis. This was due to the small number of comparable studies, a lack of quantification of the specific PRP content, considerable heterogeneity between the randomized control trials, and most effect sizes being equivocal within the framework of two estimated MCID values [47]. Another point of view was presented by de Vos et al, in their systematic review based on six studies, in which the authors stated that there was strong evidence that PRP is not effective in treating chronic lateral elbow tendinosis [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, recent systematic reviews have also provided conflicting results 46,51,52 . Simental et al performed a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs (n = 276) demonstrating no significant changes in pain (SMD = − 0.51) nor functional scores (SMD = − 0.07) between PRP and placebo injections.…”
Section: Platelet-rich Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, recent systematic reviews have also provided conflicting results 46,51,52 47 . Furthermore, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for all the patient-reported outcome measures had exceeded after PRP treatments.…”
Section: Platelet-rich Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRP components promote cell recruitment, proliferation, and angiogenesis. It has also been suggested that PRP induces a transient inflammatory response, resulting in a regenerative response and immunomodulatory effects on tenocytes [ 60 ].…”
Section: Lateral Epicondylitismentioning
confidence: 99%