Small things are important: the value of singular point elements for birds in agricultural landscapes

Abstract

Farmland birds belong to the most endangered group of vertebrates in Europe. They are an important component of farmland biodiversity considering the numerous functions they perform (e.g. seed dispersal, improving germination, increasing gene flow, nutrient recycling, and pest control). Therefore, their decline imposes substantial risks on agricultural ecosystems. In general, farmland bird conservation includes land‐use and management alterations leading to less‐intensive farming and land‐sparing for breeding habitats (e.g. agri‐environment‐climate schemes, and organic farming). However, theoretical concepts describing farmland biodiversity maintenance and applied conservation measures usually ignore the role of singular, often very small, natural or man‐made elements in an agricultural landscape. These elements play a role in the populations of certain species, their biology and in the general species richness of farmland. Furthermore, the importance of these elements has never been empirically tested, which means that conservationists and practitioners are not aware of their measurable value for birds. Herein, we define and identify singular point elements in the agricultural landscape (SPELs) which are potentially important for breeding farmland birds. We also describe each SPEL and evaluate its importance for birds in farmland based on a systematic review of the available literature. Using a horizon‐scanning technique, we then polled field ornithologists about their personal observations of birds in relation to SPELs and the evaluation of the potential roles of such structures for birds. We identified 17 SPELs that vary in naturalness and age: singular trees, singular shrubs, erratic boulders, puddles, electricity pylons, wind turbines, spiritual sites, hunting platforms, fence and border posts, wells, road signs, scarecrows, piles of manure, piles of brushwood/branches, piles of stones/debris, piles of lime, and haystacks. Analysis of the literature revealed knowledge gaps, because some SPELs are frequently mentioned in ecological studies (e.g. trees, shrubs, pylons), but others such as spiritual sites, stones, hunting platforms, wells, road signs, or piles of lime are ignored. Despite the fact that some authors incorporate the effects of some SPELs in their studies, little research to date has aimed to assess the impact of various SPELs on farmland bird species numbers and distribution. Horizon scanning revealed that ornithologists often observe birds on various SPELs and thus, attribute to SPELs many functions that are important for maintaining bird populations. Horizon scanning also highlighted the importance of SPELs for many declining bird species and suggested possible mitigation of negative changes in the agricultural landscape by retaining SPELs within fields. We suggest that a better understanding of the role of SPELs for farmland birds is required. We also recommend that SPELs are considered as a potential tool for the conservation of birds, and existing conservation programs such as agri‐...

A multi-scale analysis on the importance of patch-surroundings for farmland birds

“…fieldlark preferring open habitat over woody (Knaus et al, 2018)). Even though we analysed fine spatial scales, some small-scaled elements, which can influence birds, such as piles of stones or branches, pylons or road signs, could not be accounted for (Pustkowiak et al, 2021).…”

Habitat Characteristics Supporting Bird Species Richness in Mid-Field Woodlots

“…Mid-field woodlots are small non-productive elements in agricultural landscapes that may serve as important biodiversity refuges (e.g., Tryjanowski et al, 2014;Štrobl et al, 2019;Pustkowiak et al, 2021). However, their role as distinctive landscape features has been largely overlooked (but see Gottschalk et al, 2010;Aue et al, 2014), since previous studies have included mostly all semi-natural landscape features together at the regional scale (Billeter et al, 2008;Doxa et al, 2010;Sasaki et al, 2020) or considered larger woodland patches from the perspective of forest habitat fragmentation (McCollin, 1993;Bellamy et al, 1996;Doherty and Grubb, 2000;Bennett et al, 2004;Lorenzetti and Battisti, 2006).…”

Losses and gains of fallows impact farmland bird populations over three funding periods of the EU Common Agricultural Policy

“…In addition to fallow expansion and targeted fallow management, other non-productive biodiversityfriendly features should be supported, for instance, as parts of voluntary measures such as eco-schemes or agri-environment climate measures to bridge the gap between the new post-2020 CAP and the EU biodiversity strategy targets. These could include restoring species-rich grasslands (Alison et al 2017) or preserving isolated features such as habitat trees and high-quality hedgerows in agricultural landscapes (Pustkowiak et al 2021).…”