Sensitivity of Myocardial Radiomic Features to Imaging Parameters in Cardiac MR Imaging

Abstract

Background Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) images are often collected with different imaging parameters, which may impact the calculated values of myocardial radiomic features. Purpose To investigate the sensitivity of myocardial radiomic features to changes in imaging parameters in cardiac MR images. Study Type Prospective. Population A total of 11 healthy participants/five patients. Field Strength/ Sequence A 3 T/cine balanced steady‐state free‐precession, T1‐weighted spoiled gradient‐echo, T2‐weighted turbo spin‐echo, and quantitative T1 and T2 mapping. For each sequence, the flip angle, in‐plane resolution, slice thickness, and parallel imaging technique were varied to study the sensitivity of radiomic features to alterations in imaging parameters. Assessment Myocardial contours were manually delineated by experienced readers, and a total of 1023 radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics with 11 image filters and six feature families. Statistical Tests Sensitivity was defined as the standardized mean difference (D effect size), and the robust features were defined at sensitivity < 0.2. Sensitivity analysis was performed on predefined sets of reproducible features. The analysis was performed using the entire cohort of 16 subejcts. Results 64% of radiomic features were robust (sensitivity < 0.2) to changes in any imaging parameter. In qualitative sequences, radiomic features were most sensitive to changes in in‐plane spatial resolution (spatial resolution: 0.6 vs. flip angle: 0.19, parallel imaging: 0.18, slice thickness: 0.07; P < 0.01 for all); in quantitative sequences, radiomic features were least sensitive to changes in spatial resolution (spatial resolution: 0.07 vs. slice thickness: 0.16, flip angle: 0.24; P < 0.01 for all). In an individual feature level, no singular feature family/image filter was identified as robust (sensitivity < 0.2) across sequences; however, highly sensitive features were predominantly associated with high‐frequency wavelet filters across all sequences (32/50 features). Data Conclusion In cardiac MR, a considerable number of radiomic features are sensitive to changes in sequence parameters. Evidence Level 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 1

Image resampling and discretization effect on the estimate of myocardial radiomic features from T1 and T2 mapping in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

“…Across all analyses, first order and gray level co-occurrence matrix were the most frequently identified reproducible radiomic feature classes. Another CMR imaging study by Jang et al 57 has evaluated, in a group of healthy participants and in a heterogeneous group of patients, the sensitivity of radiomic features estimate to changes in acquisition sequence parameters including flip angle, in-plane spatial resolution, slice thickness, and parallel imaging technique. As a whole, they have found that approximately 60% of the 4007 considered radiomic features were robust to changes in any acquisition parameters (i.e., standardized Cohen’s mean difference < 0.2), with qualitative acquisition sequences (i.e., cine balanced steady-state free-precession, T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo, T2-weighted turbo spin-echo) and quantitative T1/T2 mapping most sensitive to changes in in-plane spatial resolution and flip angle, respectively.…”

Radiomics and deep learning for myocardial scar screening in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

“…We observed that only a few radiomic features were common among different cross-validations in the Radiomics model (Additional file 2 : Table S2) or the DL-Radiomics model (Additional file 2 : Table S3). Despite differences in important radiomics features between different cross-validation splits, the performance was consistent across the different cross-validation splits, which is expected given the high correlation among the radiomic features [ 37 , 38 ]. We also observed similar differences between the selected important radiomic features between the DL-Radiomics and Radiomics models.…”

Emerging Techniques in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

“…103,104 Despite the promises of radiomic imaging as a novel approach to extract imaging markers with diagnostic and prognostic value beyond standard cardiac MR parameters, there are challenges in the standardization of feature extraction, selection, and model development. Additionally, reproducibility and sensitivity in radiomics remain major research topics, with recent data showing moderate reproducibility, 105,106 sensitivity to imaging sequence parameters, 107 and sensitivity to image acquisition timing in the cardiac cycle. 108 The clinical utility and robustness of radiomic imaging markers should be further investigated using rigorous multicenter and multivendor studies.…”