2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11904-021-00548-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroimaging the Neuropathogenesis of HIV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with the success of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), various neurological complications caused by the infiltration of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the central nervous system (CNS) (1), especially HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (2), remain a heavy disease burden. Neuroimaging is a vital tool to provide insight into structural, functional, and molecular changes occurring in the brain and has the potential to comprehensively elucidate the pathogenesis of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (3,4). Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) studies of HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals have found widespread brain atrophy and volume reduction in the subcortical structures including caudate nucleus, putamen, amygdala, thalamus, hippocampus, and parahippocampus (5)(6)(7)(8), and cerebellar (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the success of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), various neurological complications caused by the infiltration of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the central nervous system (CNS) (1), especially HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (2), remain a heavy disease burden. Neuroimaging is a vital tool to provide insight into structural, functional, and molecular changes occurring in the brain and has the potential to comprehensively elucidate the pathogenesis of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (3,4). Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) studies of HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals have found widespread brain atrophy and volume reduction in the subcortical structures including caudate nucleus, putamen, amygdala, thalamus, hippocampus, and parahippocampus (5)(6)(7)(8), and cerebellar (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although effects of opioids on the BG have not been reported previously, past research suggests an antagonistic effect between volume decreases and increases related to other substance use in the setting of HIV infection 22 , 50 . One explanation for this volumetric increase is neuroinflammation 28 , which can be beneficial (e.g., tissue regeneration, protection against infection) or detrimental (e.g., cell death, chronic neurodegeneration). Sil et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects from combined methamphetamine use and seropositivity were not observed, suggesting that opposing effects masked GM changes in the BG. Alterations to the BG among PLWH who use opioids, in contrast, have not been examined 28 . It thus remains unclear whether the BG is differentially affected by stimulants and/or opioids within the context of HIV infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods that have been developed or tested in the low- to middle-income contexts where pediatric HIV infection is concentrated are particularly critical. At the same time, promising advances in neuroimaging of HIV offer additional tools for research with this population [ 90 ].…”
Section: Conclusion and Current Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, youth with PHIV have high rates of mental health problems and substance use disorders [34,[85][86][87] which often emerge during adolescence and may impact cognition directly [88] or indirectly through medication adherence [89]. Substance use is a high priority area of research due to its interactions with HIV in affecting CNS functioning and neuropathogenesis through dopamine systems and inflammation, as well as discussion of therapeutic versus harmful effects of cannabis [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100]. Studies specifically focused on youth are needed due to their different profile of substance use and the potential for greater impact due to exposure during brain development, which continues into young adulthood.…”
Section: Conclusion and Current Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%