1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00539056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

32S pre-rRNA processing: a dynamic model for interaction with U3RNA and structural rearrangements of spacer regions

Abstract: A model of rearrangement of 32S pre-rRNA during processing was proposed. The first step of these events is the cotranscriptional interaction of the 3'-half of 5.8S rRNA and adjacent part of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS-2) with the 3'-part of the small nucleolar U3RNA from its 155th to 215th nucleotides (numbered for a rat U3RNA). This interaction prevents formation of intramolecular double-stranded structure between 5'-and 3'-end sequences of 5.8S rRNA. The second step is the appearance of extended hai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike interactions proposed previously (Bachellerie et al, 1983;Crouch et al, 1983;Kupriyanova & Timofeeva, 1988;Parker et al, 1988;Parker & Steitz, 1987;Potter et al, 1995;Prestayko et al, 1970), this base-pairing is phylogenetically consistent: it is maintained not only among eukaryotes but even extends to archaea. Compelling evidence that the interaction is real and has been conserved through evolution is provided by the several canonical base-pair substitutions which have occurred between distantly related organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Unlike interactions proposed previously (Bachellerie et al, 1983;Crouch et al, 1983;Kupriyanova & Timofeeva, 1988;Parker et al, 1988;Parker & Steitz, 1987;Potter et al, 1995;Prestayko et al, 1970), this base-pairing is phylogenetically consistent: it is maintained not only among eukaryotes but even extends to archaea. Compelling evidence that the interaction is real and has been conserved through evolution is provided by the several canonical base-pair substitutions which have occurred between distantly related organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These results suggest that RFLP analysis on the ITS region only effectively reveals polymorphism between isolates where high genetic distances are expected, based either on the results of preliminary mycological analysis or on the geographical distance between the collection localities. This can be explained by the results of recent studies showing that only the ITS1 region accumulates numerous SNPs in its sequence, compared to the other spacer region ITS2, while the 5.8S rDNA gene includes no polymorphism in Macrophomina [39,[45][46][47]. This is not surprising because ITS1 has a higher mutation rate than ITS2, since this region plays a role in the ribosomal maturation process and proved to be more conserved in its sequence [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1). One set of models (5)(6)(7)(8)(9) involves base pairing between U3 RNA and sequences (b and c in Fig. 1) within the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of the 32S rRNA precursor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%