2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential psychological effects of cognitive-behavioral stress management among breast cancer patients with high and low initial cancer-specific distress

Abstract: CBSM decreased negative affect and intrusive thoughts and increases positive affect among post-surgical BCa patients presenting with elevated cancer-specific distress after surgery, but did not show similar effects in women with low levels of cancer-specific distress. Identifying patients most in need of intervention in the period after surgery may optimize cost-effective cancer care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that patients with greater levels of NA and disease‐related challenges (eg, patients with mBCa) may benefit the most from such interventions 76 . The current findings suggest that patients with mBCa who report the greatest levels of NA display reduced brain activity in regions that could be modulated by training in stress management that addresses the functions associated with these regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It is possible that patients with greater levels of NA and disease‐related challenges (eg, patients with mBCa) may benefit the most from such interventions 76 . The current findings suggest that patients with mBCa who report the greatest levels of NA display reduced brain activity in regions that could be modulated by training in stress management that addresses the functions associated with these regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In terms of the “who” question, we need more information on which subgroups of patients are likely to benefit the most from SM interventions. Although there is evidence that patients with greater cancer‐specific distress, pessimism, and other psychosocial adversity indicators experience the greatest effects of these interventions on psychological adaptation, there is no evidence to date that these psychosocial characteristics can predict the effects of an intervention on biobehavioral and long‐term clinical health outcomes. Beyond psychosocial characteristics, it is also important to explore biomedical (eg, tumor phenotype and immune system status) and sociodemographic factors that can be used to identify which patients are most likely to experience psychological, biobehavioral, and health benefits.…”
Section: Sm and The Immune Processes In Patients With Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, CPSP is heavily influenced by emotional distress, which has led to a general call for ways to target the emotional distress, since this is a modifiable risk factor that could be intervened on ( Jackson et al, 2016 ). In a recent study, those women with the highest level of distress after surgery were those who benefited the most from a psychological treatment ( Wang et al, 2018a , b ). We therefore argue that from a prevention perspective, timing of the intervention is crucial.…”
Section: Peri- and Postoperative Stress – The Crucial Time Just Before During And After Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%