2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The outcome of surgical management of proximal humeral fractures using locking plates: comparison between locking plates with different geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is particularly advantageous in osteoporotic bone. The conical pattern of proximal screw distribution supports the articular surface: screws act as pillars for subchondral bone 46 . To obtain good results in plating, the first mandatory step is fracture reduction.…”
Section: Plate Fixationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This mechanism is particularly advantageous in osteoporotic bone. The conical pattern of proximal screw distribution supports the articular surface: screws act as pillars for subchondral bone 46 . To obtain good results in plating, the first mandatory step is fracture reduction.…”
Section: Plate Fixationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In our previous work [ 15 ], we confirmed that fractures with disrupted medial calcar support are associated with unfavorable clinical and radiographic outcomes. Additionally, we also identified that medial calcar disruption is a significant risk factor for predicting the osteonecrosis of humeral head and redisplacement of fracture reduction following ORIF [ 31 ]. To further verify the effect of medial support on plate fixation stability, we modified the method proposed by Carbone et al [ 19 ] to evaluate the extent of humeral head impaction in the status of osteoporosis combined with medial support deficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reanalyzed the included literature by excluding each piece one at a time, and after excluding Fraser's (21) literature, we discovered that the reoperation rate SUCRA values for LP were significantly higher than HA. This finding may be related to the fact that, despite being consistently categorized as locking plate internal fixation, the technique of the procedure and the plates have been evolving over time (32)(33)(34). This implies that the results of earlier human research need to be viewed with greater objectivity because improved surgical procedures and plates may have reduced the incidence of negative events like reoperation rates for LP-treated proximal humeral fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%