2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-352x(00)00024-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3-D elastic analysis of vertical piles subjected to “passive” loadings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of ground movement effects on groups of piles has been reported by several authors, for example, Kuwabara and Poulos (1989), Teh and Wong (1993), Chow et al (1990), Xu and Poulos (2001). All these authors have found that under purely elastic conditions, group effects tend to be beneficial to the pile response as compared to single isolated piles, i.e.…”
Section: Group Effectsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The analysis of ground movement effects on groups of piles has been reported by several authors, for example, Kuwabara and Poulos (1989), Teh and Wong (1993), Chow et al (1990), Xu and Poulos (2001). All these authors have found that under purely elastic conditions, group effects tend to be beneficial to the pile response as compared to single isolated piles, i.e.…”
Section: Group Effectsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The analysis on the correction factor is valuable in leading to a better understanding of the influence of the reaction piles on the test pile behavior. Present methods considering the interactive effect among piles mainly include the load transfer method (Kraft et al, 1981;Guo, 2001), the elastic theory method (Poulos and Davis, 1980;Mylonakis and Gazetas, 1998;Poulos, 2001), the method based on energy principles (Klar and Leung, 2009), the finite element method (Xu and Poulos, 2001;Reul and Randolph, 2003;de Sanctis and Mandolini, 2006) and various empirical methods. However, these interaction models are commonly utilized for piles of identical dimensions, and not suitable for piles with different diameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant research has been carried out to estimate additional forces and deformations in existing piles induced by tunneling. The responses of piles subject to the ground movement induced by tunneling were assessed based on laboratory experiments 1–3, force‐controlled finite element methods (FCFEM) 4, 5, deformation‐controlled finite element methods (DCFEM) 6, 7, and simplified two‐stage methods 8–12. The two‐stage method proposed by Xu and Poulos 8 and Loganathan et al 9 employs the boundary element method; however, this has not been extended to layered soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The responses of piles subject to the ground movement induced by tunneling were assessed based on laboratory experiments 1–3, force‐controlled finite element methods (FCFEM) 4, 5, deformation‐controlled finite element methods (DCFEM) 6, 7, and simplified two‐stage methods 8–12. The two‐stage method proposed by Xu and Poulos 8 and Loganathan et al 9 employs the boundary element method; however, this has not been extended to layered soils. Kitiyodom et al 10, 11 and Huang et al 12 adopted a Winkler subgrade reaction model that did not consider the vertical interaction between the nodes in the same pile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%