Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined 2017
DOI: 10.11647/obp.0130.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3. Clarification

Abstract: The means-ends distinction 2.6.5 A5: Functionings and capabilities as the evaluative space 2.6.6 A6: Other dimensions of ultimate value 2.6.7 A7: Value pluralism 2.6.8 A8: The principle of each person as an end 2.7 The B-modules: non-optional modules with optional content 2.7.1 B1: The purpose of the capability theory 2.7.2 B2: The selection of dimensions 2.7.3 B3: Human diversity 2.7.4 B4: Agency 2.7.5 B5: Structural constraints 2.7.6 B6: The choice between functionings, capabilities, or both 2.7.7 B7: Meta-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify the differences between female and male ex-combatants of the FARC-EP, it is precise to point out the conversion factors. Robeyns (2017, p. 43) defined them as “the factors that determine the degree to which a person can transform a resource into a functioning.” Using Sen's example, people can have the same resource, a bicycle; however, if one does not know how to ride, has a disability, there are no roads to ride on, or riding in certain places puts her integrity at risk, she will present greater difficulties in her capability of mobility. Thus, the (un)balance of capabilities, structural inequalities, and systemic oppressions allow us to understand choices, practices, and effects on women's lives.…”
Section: Breaking Gender Regulations: Challenges With Reincorporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To identify the differences between female and male ex-combatants of the FARC-EP, it is precise to point out the conversion factors. Robeyns (2017, p. 43) defined them as “the factors that determine the degree to which a person can transform a resource into a functioning.” Using Sen's example, people can have the same resource, a bicycle; however, if one does not know how to ride, has a disability, there are no roads to ride on, or riding in certain places puts her integrity at risk, she will present greater difficulties in her capability of mobility. Thus, the (un)balance of capabilities, structural inequalities, and systemic oppressions allow us to understand choices, practices, and effects on women's lives.…”
Section: Breaking Gender Regulations: Challenges With Reincorporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, are there differences in the reincorporation process compared to male counterparts? I will use the capability approach to identify the set of liberties, and the real opportunities they have to foster their human development (Nussbaum, 2000; Robeyns, 2011, 2017). As Martha Nussbaum argues, women have all too often been treated as the supporters of the ends of others, rather than as ends in their own, therefore, international political and economic thought must be sensitive to gender difference as a problem of social justice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the emphasis on individual agency, the capability approach considers the importance of resources and contextual factors and how they can be transformed into opportunities. These transformations are impacted by conversion factors, which are often categorised into three groups (Robeyns, 2005 , 2017 ): (a) personal conversion factors relate to the unique qualities of the individual such as health, sex, or education; (b) social conversion factors, on the other hand, derive from society and can include social norms, public policies, social hierarchies, and power relations associated with class, gender, race, or caste. Finally, (c) environmental conversion factors stem from the physical/built environment in which a person lives and considers factors such as climate, pollution, built infrastructure, and landscape.…”
Section: The Capability Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capability approach has pushed scholars to emphasise that an individual’s agency is dependent not only on the resources available to them but also on their personal circumstances and socio-environmental contexts. By viewing well-being through the capability approach, it is the individuals that determine what a good life means to them and what choices they make to realise this within their personal, societal, and environmental contexts (Robeyns, 2017 ; Sen, 1999 ). What is important to note is that the capability approach can be seen as a framework of thought that can be further specified through theory (Robeyns, 2003 ).…”
Section: The Capability Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dignity and autonomy are viewed as cross-cutting outcomes within and across these ten capabilities (Burchardt and Vizard, 2011). Other capability lists have been proposed, debated and used in the literature (for an overview, see Robeyns, 2017).…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%