3 Challenges, 3 Errors, and 3 Solutions to Integrate Frontline Communities in Climate Change Policy and Research: Lessons From California

Abstract

Frontline communities of California experience disproportionate social, economic, and environmental injustices, and climate change is exacerbating the root causes of inequity in those areas. Yet, climate adaptation and mitigation strategies often fail to meaningfully address the experience of frontline community stakeholders. Here, we present three challenges, three errors, and three solutions to better integrate frontline communities' needs in climate change research and to create more impactful policies. We base our perspective on our collective firsthand experiences and on scholarship to bridge local knowledge with hydroclimatic research and policymaking. Unawareness of local priorities (Challenge 1) is a consequence of Ignoring local knowledge (Error 1) that can be, in part, resolved with Information exchange and expansion of community-based participatory research (Solution 1). Unequal access to natural resources (Challenge 2) is often due to Top-down decision making (Error 2), but Buffer zones for environmental protection, green areas, air quality, and water security can help achieve environmental justice (Solution 2). Unequal access to public services (Challenge 3) is a historical issue that persists because of System abuse and tokenism (Error 3), and it may be partially resolved with Multi-benefit projects to create socioeconomic and environmental opportunities within frontline communities that include positive externalities for other stakeholders and public service improvements (Solution 3). The path forward in climate change policy decision-making must be grounded in collaboration with frontline community members and practitioners trained in working with vulnerable stakeholders. Addressing co-occurring inequities exacerbated by climate change requires transdisciplinary efforts to identify technical, policy, and engineering solutions.

Race, citizenship, and belonging in the pursuit of water and climate justice in California

“…Attention to the diversity of perspectives and approaches preferred by different actors is crucial for supporting more just and inclusive infrastructural development processes. These findings clarify the importance of foregrounding value and knowledge pluralism to advance equitable reconstitutions of hydrosocial territories in the pursuit of water security and climate justice (Fernandez-Bou et al, 2021; Mills-Novoa et al, 2022; Ziervogel et al, 2017).…”

Harnessing the power of microbes for sustainable development: Climate change mitigation and sustainable food security

“…As a result, they might be a viable option for improving soil properties, and thus productivity in vulnerable areas. Microbial inoculants have become crucial in agroecosystems for a variety of reasons, which include increasing plant health, minimizing heavy metal toxicity, improving plant drought resistance, lowering plants' growth stressors, preventing plants from various diseases, and improving absorption of nutrients (Babalola, 2010; Bashan et al, 2014; Fernandez‐Bou et al, 2022; Mardukhi et al, 2011; Miransari, 2010; Ortiz et al, 2015; Sessitsch et al, 2013; Wani & Khan, 2013). Furthermore, microbial inoculants are recognized to be the most important determinant of soil quality (Pal & Pandey, 2014).…”