2009
DOI: 10.1002/mop.24459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D to 3D rectangular waveguide filter designs from linear iterated prediction space mapping optimization

Abstract: In this article, an optimization procedure is described to align electromagnetic (EM) three‐dimensional (3D) models with two‐dimensional (2D) models for the design of RF/microwave circuits. The optimization procedure is realized from a modified standard space mapping (SM) approach. The mapping function between the 2D and 3D parameter spaces is directly obtained from a linear iterated prediction method, which reduces the computational cost and also avoids inverse transformations. The linear iterated prediction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the optimization of the selected low‐order 3‐D filter, an IL‐SM procedure is used to find an approximate root of the system of nonlinear equations X3normalD,0.25emi+1=P0.25em1i()bold-italicX2D=Ai+Bi0.25emX2normalD1.25emi=0,0.25em1,0.25em2, where X2normalD=[]X2normalD0.5emX3normalD,z, X 3D, z is known, X 2D is obtained from in the first sub‐process and P1i is a multidimensional IL vector function ( A i and B i are the coefficient vectors), which is iteratively evaluated through an alignment of the 2‐D and 3‐D EM simulator responses of the selected low‐order filter up to satisfy the error criterion ε e22=i=1q||0.25emeiT220.5emε where e22 is the square of the Euclidean norm of the error vector e , q is the number of discrete frequency points aligning the discrete response specifications between the 2‐D and 3‐D EM simulator responses and e q is the q th error vector given by eq=R2normalD(),bold-italicX2DfqR3normal...…”
Section: Cil‐sm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the optimization of the selected low‐order 3‐D filter, an IL‐SM procedure is used to find an approximate root of the system of nonlinear equations X3normalD,0.25emi+1=P0.25em1i()bold-italicX2D=Ai+Bi0.25emX2normalD1.25emi=0,0.25em1,0.25em2, where X2normalD=[]X2normalD0.5emX3normalD,z, X 3D, z is known, X 2D is obtained from in the first sub‐process and P1i is a multidimensional IL vector function ( A i and B i are the coefficient vectors), which is iteratively evaluated through an alignment of the 2‐D and 3‐D EM simulator responses of the selected low‐order filter up to satisfy the error criterion ε e22=i=1q||0.25emeiT220.5emε where e22 is the square of the Euclidean norm of the error vector e , q is the number of discrete frequency points aligning the discrete response specifications between the 2‐D and 3‐D EM simulator responses and e q is the q th error vector given by eq=R2normalD(),bold-italicX2DfqR3normal...…”
Section: Cil‐sm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies use space mapping (SM) optimization techniques in order to reduce the design time . Nevertheless, the first approaches still require a significant amount of computation time and memory to optimize high‐order 3‐D filters , while the last method was introduced for the optimization of 2‐D filters (inductive waveguide structures) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An improvement of the original SM technique was achieved with the aggressive SM [19], which further reduces the number of fine analyses. Among the variety of applications, SM optimization has been also applied successfully to the design of waveguide components [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%