2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40571-022-00474-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D SPH simulation of an anaerobic digester

Abstract: Understanding the hydrodynamics within the anaerobic digester tank of a wastewater treatment plant is of high importance to ensure sufficient mixing and subsequently a homogeneous distribution of the substrates. In this paper, we demonstrate a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulation of a real-world case study focusing on both, the methodology and the operation of mixing. For this work, DualSPHysics, a Lagrangian solver, has been explored as an alternative to the more commonly used Eulerian solv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pre-processing of data (computational fluid dynamic simulations) is one limitation that cannot be overlooked, however it is not within the scope of this study. A thorough study conducted by Kumar et al (2022) had covered this topic. In the current implementation of CHAD, simulating the 3D lab-scale reaction tank in the study case on an AMD Ryzen 7 5800X CPU (parallelized among 12 computational threads), excluding the thermal and chemical diffusion, takes around 2800 s for a 200-second reaction.…”
Section: Computational Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-processing of data (computational fluid dynamic simulations) is one limitation that cannot be overlooked, however it is not within the scope of this study. A thorough study conducted by Kumar et al (2022) had covered this topic. In the current implementation of CHAD, simulating the 3D lab-scale reaction tank in the study case on an AMD Ryzen 7 5800X CPU (parallelized among 12 computational threads), excluding the thermal and chemical diffusion, takes around 2800 s for a 200-second reaction.…”
Section: Computational Costmentioning
confidence: 99%