2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D coupled HM-XFEM modeling with cohesive zone model and applications to fluid-driven fracture network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. End * is the admissible error of the Newton-Raphson iteration and w n d n is obtained from (22). Therefore, the increments of the primary variables, Δd and Δp, at the ith iteration of time t = t n , are determined from the linear system…”
Section: Fully Coupled Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. End * is the admissible error of the Newton-Raphson iteration and w n d n is obtained from (22). Therefore, the increments of the primary variables, Δd and Δp, at the ith iteration of time t = t n , are determined from the linear system…”
Section: Fully Coupled Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The first trend focuses on improving the computational aspects of the models by employing state-of-the-art numerical techniques to develop models that overcome the limitations of their existing counterparts. Examples are studies that employed different variations of the boundary integrals method, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] finite element method, [12][13][14][15][16] extended/generalized finite elements, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] phase field methods, [31][32][33][34][35][36] and hybrid finite element/eXtended finite element-distinct element techniques (FEM-DEM or XFEM-DEM) [37][38][39][40] to develop 2D and 3D HF models. Additionally, some recent studies have coupled boundary integral or extended finite element methods with fracture tip asymptotes and presented efficient multiscale models of HFs under different propagation regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using XFEM for fluid infiltrated medium, a proper enrichment needs to be implemented to reproduce the pore-pressure variation in the solid matrix associated with the fracture (discontinuity in the pressure gradient normal to the fracture). Different schemes have been proposed (Mohammadnejad and Khoei, 2013a;Faivre et al, 2016;Meschke and Leonhart, 2015). The lack of consistent benchmarking and convergence studies renders the discussion on the efficiency and robustness of these different schemes rather difficult.…”
Section: Extended / Generalized Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2D, using an extension of XFEM accounting for poroelasticity, a cohesive zone approach within an XFEM formulation appears to properly reproduce the known solutions for a planestrain propagating hydraulic fracture (Faivre et al, 2016). See also Mohammadnejad and Khoei (2013a,b); Salimzadeh and Khalili (2015) for the fully or partially saturated case but with fewer benchmarks, and Mohammadnejad and Andrade (2016) for the case of fracture closure and re-opening.…”
Section: Extended / Generalized Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage evolution is defined via cohesive segment at which the fracture energy is released once the corresponding initiation criterion is reached. In this respect, the TSL was employed for a fracture mechanics analysis . Although there are several kinds of typical shapes constructing the TSL, their effects are not significant .…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%