2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D and 3D MOCART scoring systems assessed by 9.4 T high-field MRI correlate with elementary and complex histological scoring systems in a translational model of osteochondral repair

Abstract: Most categories of the 2D and 3D MOCART systems correlate, while total scores were generally higher using the 3D MOCART system. Structural categories "total points" and "defect fill" can reliably be assessed by 9.4 T MRI evaluation using either system, "subchondral bone plate" using the 3D MOCART score. High-field MRI is valuable to objectively evaluate osteochondral repair in translational settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially it allows to grade the entire cartilage defect at once, which is only achievable by histology if a large number of sections throughout the entire defect are evaluated. Previously, highly significant internal correlations of the five macroscopic scoring systems 3 as well as between the Sellers and Wakitani scores have been reported 6 , emphasizing the value of macroscopy to grade articular cartilage repair. High correlations for the structural categories "defect fill" and "integration" were detected when the macroscopic scoring systems were correlated with the elementary Wakitani and comprehensive Sellers scoring systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Especially it allows to grade the entire cartilage defect at once, which is only achievable by histology if a large number of sections throughout the entire defect are evaluated. Previously, highly significant internal correlations of the five macroscopic scoring systems 3 as well as between the Sellers and Wakitani scores have been reported 6 , emphasizing the value of macroscopy to grade articular cartilage repair. High correlations for the structural categories "defect fill" and "integration" were detected when the macroscopic scoring systems were correlated with the elementary Wakitani and comprehensive Sellers scoring systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Highlighted in bolt and gray are parameters which can be correlated between macroscopy and histology. 3,6 . Specifically, correlations for key parameters such as "defect fill" and "total points" are existent, thus further strengthening the value of macroscopy to grade defect repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, direct comparison of UBM and MRI on human would be required. Experimental high-field MRI at 9.4 T has been shown to allow reliable evaluation of explanted cartilage repair tissue in sheep, since it provides much better resolution (Goebel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Articular Cartilage imaging Group of the international Cartilage Repair society (iCRs) defined MoCARt, a set of pertinent variables for describing articular cartilage repair tissues after treatment using a biological repair technique (25); the MoCARt assesses the degree of defect repair and filling, the border zone integration, the surface, structure and signal intensity of the repair tissue, the subchondral lamina and bone, adhesions and effusion, and it gives a score ranging from 0 to 100. the MoCARt score was calculated on post-operative MRi 12 months after surgery by two independent orthopaedic surgeons blinded to the study. All MRi procedures were performed at 1.5t (MA -GnE toM Avanto, siemens Medical solution, Forchein, Germany, gradient strength 45 mt/m, slew rate 200 t/m/ms; MAGnEtoM Espree, siemens Medical solution, Forchein, Germany, gradient strength 33 mt/m, slew rate 170 t/m/ms), using standard imaging sequences and a dedicated extremity coil.…”
Section: Clinical and Imaging Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%