eCM 2016
DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v031a09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D ultrasound biomicroscopy for assessment of cartilage repair tissue: volumetric characterisation and correlation to established classification systems

Abstract: Objective and sensitive assessment of cartilage repair outcomes lacks suitable methods. This study investigated the feasibility of 3D ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) to quantify cartilage repair outcomes volumetrically and their correlation with established classification systems. 32 sheep underwent bilateral treatment of a focal cartilage defect. One or two years post-operatively the repair outcomes were assessed and scored macroscopically (Outerbridge, ICRS-CRA), by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, MOCART), a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple 3D histopathological grading methods for different tissues have been proposed in the literature, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 12e15 , optical imaging 16 , ultrasound 17 , and atomic force microscopy 18 . 3D grading methods could possibly serve as a reference for clinical 3D modalities, as well as higher resolution 3D techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple 3D histopathological grading methods for different tissues have been proposed in the literature, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 12e15 , optical imaging 16 , ultrasound 17 , and atomic force microscopy 18 . 3D grading methods could possibly serve as a reference for clinical 3D modalities, as well as higher resolution 3D techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple 3D histopathological grading methods for different tissues have been proposed in the literature, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [12][13][14][15] , optical imaging 16 , ultrasound 17 , and atomic force microscopy 18 . 3D grading methods could possibly serve as a reference for clinical 3D modalities, as well as higher resolution 3D techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, 3D micro-level imaging technologies, based on optics 9 , sound 10 , 11 , ionizing radiation 12 and magnetic resonance 13 , can visualize relatively large tissue volumes (millimeters to centimeters). Such technologies could provide significant benefits over conventional section-based histopathology, such as: (1) minimal destructiveness, (2) no sectioning artefacts and (3) assessment of volumes (3D tissue structure, and composition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future candidates for 3D micro-level imaging, which permit histopathological evaluation of OC structure, include optical coherence tomography (OCT) 9 , photo-acoustic imaging 11 , ultrasound biomicroscopy (USBM) 10 , scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 17 , transmission electron microscopy (TEM) 18 , and micro-magnetic resonance imaging (μMRI) 13 . However, currently their resolution and contrast mechanism are either insufficient to visualize structural or compositional details reliably in a large volume (few mm 3 ) with sub-cellular resolution (1–10 μm) or they essentially miss one spatial dimension (SEM, TEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%