2021
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2020.3002805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D and 3D CT Radiomic Features Performance Comparison in Characterization of Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Center Study

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The LASSO is a shrinkage and selection method for linear regression. It minimizes the usual sum of squared errors, with a bound on the sum of the absolute values of the coefficients (Meng et al., 2020). The optimization objective for LASSO is: normalminβ1ni=1n)(yixiβT2+λfalse‖βfalse‖1where x i is the i ‐th patient's feature vector, yi is the classification variable, β is the weight vector of the linear model, and λ>0 is a penalty term, which controls the value of shrinkage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LASSO is a shrinkage and selection method for linear regression. It minimizes the usual sum of squared errors, with a bound on the sum of the absolute values of the coefficients (Meng et al., 2020). The optimization objective for LASSO is: normalminβ1ni=1n)(yixiβT2+λfalse‖βfalse‖1where x i is the i ‐th patient's feature vector, yi is the classification variable, β is the weight vector of the linear model, and λ>0 is a penalty term, which controls the value of shrinkage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since annotations of the ROIs are not created as a routine work in the clinical practice, we considered our algorithm should work with minimal labor. Aside from that, several past studies reported that two-dimensional radiomic features based on the CT images with maximum solid tumor areas showed comparable performance to the three-dimensional features in characterization of tumors [26,27]. Therefore, the two-dimensional feature extraction algorithms were applied in the present study.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Anisotropic CT images and ROIs were transformed into isotropic images with an isovoxel size of 0.77 mm (mode pixel size in the training dataset), using cubic and shape-based interpolations [25], respectively. In the present study, an axial plane of each CT image, which contained the maximum axial plane area of the ROIs, was selected for the calculation of radiomic features [26,27]. Since annotations of the ROIs are not created as a routine work in the clinical practice, we considered our algorithm should work with minimal labor.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All CT images were then resized to 40 × 243 × 243. Next, we utilized lung volume corresponding binary volume masks to extract radiomic features, then center-cropped the lung volume to a size of 20 × 243 × 243 to focus on the central slice of lung volume [19]. The cropped lung volume was then inputted into our 3D DL model.…”
Section: B Automated Ct Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%