2018
DOI: 10.1111/epi.14474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative positron emission tomography–guided magnetic resonance imaging postprocessing in magnetic resonance imaging–negative epilepsies

Abstract: Our study demonstrates a practical and effective approach to combine quantitative analyses of functional (QPET) and structural (MAP) imaging data to improve identification of subtle epileptic abnormalities. This approach can be readily adopted by epilepsy centers to improve postresective seizure outcomes for patients without apparent lesions on MRI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the above efforts to optimize the yield of MRI, subtle FCD, particularly FCD type I, can remain undetected in a substantial number of cases by conventional imaging. In such cases, additional MRI sequences such as magnetization transfer imaging, and various postprocessing methods, including curvilinear reformatting and morphometric analysis of T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR images may be able to detect subtle structural abnormalities [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, centers use different acquisition and post-processing protocols that can yield highly variable findings that are difficult to compare.…”
Section: Structural Mr Imaging In Detection Of Subtle Epileptogenic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the above efforts to optimize the yield of MRI, subtle FCD, particularly FCD type I, can remain undetected in a substantial number of cases by conventional imaging. In such cases, additional MRI sequences such as magnetization transfer imaging, and various postprocessing methods, including curvilinear reformatting and morphometric analysis of T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR images may be able to detect subtle structural abnormalities [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, centers use different acquisition and post-processing protocols that can yield highly variable findings that are difficult to compare.…”
Section: Structural Mr Imaging In Detection Of Subtle Epileptogenic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study reported a practical and effective multimodal imaging approach to detect subtle epileptic abnormalities by combined, quantitative MRI and FDG-PET analyses in patients with negative preoperative MRI [12]. MRI scans underwent morphometric analysis to detect subtle FCD causing blurring of the grey/white matter junction.…”
Section: Fdg-pet In Children With Non-localizing Mri and Mild Cortical Developmental Malformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of subtle but visually identifiable changes using T1, T2, and FLAIR images is the usual method for validating MAP results ( 17 , 41 , 44 ). Using positron emission tomography or magnetoencephalography to confine the MAP findings by adding functional or electrical information is another way ( 18 , 28 ). As a structural image that provides new information, even when voxel-based morphometric analysis based on FLAWS is unavailable, there are still practical implications using FLAWS with the current MAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True positive was defined as concordance between the FLAWS/MAP findings and resection with good surgical outcome, false positive as concordance between the FLAWS/MAP findings and resection with poor surgical outcome, true negative as non-concordance between the FLAWS/MAP findings and resection with poor surgical outcome, and false negative as non-concordance between FLAWS/MAP findings and resection with good surgical outcome. These definitions were based on those of previous reports in the literature ( 18 , 30 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation