2019
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract: There is much room for improvement concerning the reported designs, conduct, and analysis of surgical RCTs. Considering the difficulty of surgical RCTs, some other approaches, such as surgeons' eligibility, performance of pilot studies, or implementation of pragmatic RCTs/expertise-based trials, should be feasibly implemented to overcome the presented challenges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study design did not include patient randomization, which is the standard robust methodological approach [27]. However, given the fact that study participants stemmed from the same reference population and that no differences in baseline patient demographics or tumor data could be demonstrated, implementing randomization would have been highly challenging for logistics in the multicenter setting without necessarily adding much more to the study results [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design did not include patient randomization, which is the standard robust methodological approach [27]. However, given the fact that study participants stemmed from the same reference population and that no differences in baseline patient demographics or tumor data could be demonstrated, implementing randomization would have been highly challenging for logistics in the multicenter setting without necessarily adding much more to the study results [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given obvious ethical and applicative challenges in randomising between BCS and mastectomy, further advancement of the knowledge base on optimal surgical treatment will require some degree of reliance on observational studies. Although these studies do not replicate the purity of RCTs, nevertheless, they offer crucial information for real-life clinical practice [25,26,57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Limitations of our meta-analysis include the retrospective and observational nature of included studies and the significant heterogeneity among the studies. There were no randomized controlled trials in this study, although conducting one could account for potential biases and confounders, the non-randomized evidence to the risk of meningiomas is so extensive that this would unlikely take place, from practical and ethical standpoints 66 . A further limitation of the available data is that there is little known about the impact of past exposure or whether there is a cumulative dose effect, and hence we were unable to weigh the effect of historical doses versus current doses differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%